The amount of knowledge required for diagnostic surgical pathology is vast. More importantly, to be a decent surgical pathologist you really have to love what you do, because you must have in-depth knowledge of every diagnosis you render, because in real life clinicians will call you up asking about your diagnosis, it's prognosis and treatment. Superficial knowledge based on review books etc. can land you in very serious truoble when you sign-out. You mentioned Robbins, let me tell you by the time you enter residency you should know it by heart. By the time you complete your AP residency you should know either "Rosai" or "Sternberg" by heart. When you complete your fellowship, you must know the "standard text " in your fellowship field by heart. When you start practicing then depending upon your practice you must know "several texts" by heart.
Not to discourage you. But I have seen docs entering pathology considering it easy. This fallacy is based on a very limited exposure during med school.
To be a decent pathologist you must be smart and very well read, otherwise you will get into a heap of trouble sooner or latter.
I will give you an example of my sign-out friday: started at 6:30 am finished 6:30 pm (I am in a very busy practice, but thats where the big bucks are)
Biopsies: Six breast biopsies, Seven prostate biopsies, 40 GI biopsies, Two Liver biopsies, Ten skin biopsies, Five endometrial biopsies, Twelve other stuff (vocal cord etc)
Larges: Three melanoma cases, Five breast cases, two prostate cases, one laryngectomy, one cystoprostatectomy, one mandibulectomy, three colon cancers , two lung cancers and a random mix of other stuff.
The diagnosis included amelanotic melanoma, ameloblastoma,micropapillary urothelial carcinoma, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of lung, ductal adenocarcinoma of prostate etc.
And this was an easy day because I really had no zebras (like the interdigitating dendritic reticulum cell sarcoma I had in an HIV positive guys cervical nodes the other day).
I hope you get a picture and not jump from the frying pan into the fire.
It is a very cool field, but only for those who like it.
PS. Sorry for the typos, have to get back to sign-out (Yes I sign-out Saturday and Sunday, and it gives me great pleasure to know that I am getting better and better at what I do with each passing day)
Ofcourse, you can be a "weak pathologist" and send every difficult case out for consult, but sooner or latter you will loose respect and be ridiculed. Not entering the field is better than being a "weak pathologist" .