- Joined
- Mar 8, 2012
- Messages
- 55
- Reaction score
- 3
I'm taking the MCAT for the first time next summer. Is it too early to start doing light study for it? If not, can anyone direct me towards a good 1 year MCAT study schedule?
You'll likely forget the stuff you studied in the first 6 months by the time you take the test.
but if you start early and learn the material early and then look over the material again maybe 3~4 months before the exam, wouldn't you understand the material better since you have looked at the material before?
but if you start early and learn the material early and then look over the material again maybe 3~4 months before the exam, wouldn't you understand the material better since you have looked at the material before?
Starting year ahead of time is a waste of time and energy. Keep in mind that the MCAT should be review anyway, since you should've covered this stuff in your prereqs already. I don't know why you'd want to learn it in your prereqs, learn it again to forget it, then learn it a third time when you're actually building up to your MCAT. Cut out the middle review.
Don't take the MCAT without at least being in (and near the end) of the final semester of your remaining prereq(s).I decided to do premed kind of late. I'm finishing up my sophomore year and the only prereq I have done is Principles of Biology. I intend to take the MCAT during the summer between my junior and senior years, and I won't even have orgo finished by then. So I can't rely on my prereqs for MCAT knowledge. If I start studying MCAT material now, maybe it'll help me when I actually take the prereqs? :-D
I decided to do premed kind of late. I'm finishing up my sophomore year and the only prereq I have done is Principles of Biology. I intend to take the MCAT during the summer between my junior and senior years, and I won't even have orgo finished by then. So I can't rely on my prereqs for MCAT knowledge. If I start studying MCAT material now, maybe it'll help me when I actually take the prereqs? :-D
Honestly, there's not THAT much material to cover. In my opinion, it's more of a reading comprehension test than an actual, "state the equation and answer for XYZ" type of test.
I think you'd be better off reading research articles published by the social sciences. Look for articles about things like: globalization, ethic rights, gender equality, etc etc.
tl;dr: 1 year of study time is unnecessary. If you have free time focus on reading comprehension.
So is that why MCAT is hard? Reading comprehension? not necessarily because of all the science?
Check out the MCAT Q&A sub-forum for examples of difficult MCAT-style questions.So is that why MCAT is hard? Reading comprehension? not necessarily because of all the science?
Disagree 100%. Step 1 is the most important test of your life, as it essentially determines which fields you have open to you.I disagree with everyone saying 1 year is too far in advance. There is so much practice material out there, that if you are dedicated could really benefit you. If you are planning to do content review for a year... yes that is a bad idea, but if you have the time, energy, and money, I would doing your content review with practice problems spread through out. Then EK 1001 books, then you could move on to TPR books and/or Kaplan quizzes/question bank. Then I would do TBR passages, as general thought says these are the best. You could finish all of that in 6 to 9 months and then just take practice tests every other day up until your test for the last 3-5 months, reviewing the exam on the other days.
I think a lot of the negative attention is that a lot of people wish they had studied more but didn't have the time/discipline. This is arguably the biggest test of your life, why not study for it as much as you can. I would sacrifice ECs for it, but if you are doing practice passages for the majority of the time, why not? You will just become more comfortable with the material and get a better score. With the GS exams, coupled with an online Kaplan or PR course, and the AAMC exams, you could slam out 30+ practice exams in your last 3 or 4 months before the exam at a leisurely pace.
My vote is go for it and don't let the naysayers on here drag you down. I wish I had done something like this...
I disagree with everyone saying 1 year is too far in advance. There is so much practice material out there, that if you are dedicated could really benefit you. If you are planning to do content review for a year... yes that is a bad idea, but if you have the time, energy, and money, I would doing your content review with practice problems spread through out. Then EK 1001 books, then you could move on to TPR books and/or Kaplan quizzes/question bank. Then I would do TBR passages, as general thought says these are the best. You could finish all of that in 6 to 9 months and then just take practice tests every other day up until your test for the last 3-5 months, reviewing the exam on the other days.
I think a lot of the negative attention is that a lot of people wish they had studied more but didn't have the time/discipline. This is arguably the biggest test of your life, why not study for it as much as you can. I would sacrifice ECs for it, but if you are doing practice passages for the majority of the time, why not? You will just become more comfortable with the material and get a better score. With the GS exams, coupled with an online Kaplan or PR course, and the AAMC exams, you could slam out 30+ practice exams in your last 3 or 4 months before the exam at a leisurely pace.
My vote is go for it and don't let the naysayers on here drag you down. I wish I had done something like this...
I'm taking the MCAT for the first time next summer. Is it too early to start doing light study for it? If not, can anyone direct me towards a good 1 year MCAT study schedule?
There is no point starting 1 year early. If you really want to do some preparations you could start reading science magazines and classic novels to increase reading speed and get accustomed to more challenging passages.
Disagree 100%. Step 1 is the most important test of your life, as it essentially determines which fields you have open to you.
Read: Arguably, which means an argument could be made for it. The argument goes you don't have any fields open to you if you don't get in...and the guy is shooting for Top 10. If he is shooting for top 10 it would seem that he would need a more competitive score on the MCAT than he would need later on for Step 1 in terms of options, maybe if he wants to go into Derm...
Again... I said if it wouldn't damage his ECs. If he isn't doing a lot this summer and wants to hit the books, why not?
@ MCloaf - If he is shooting 40+ I think it is reasonable for him to study that long, or at least in range of it. Also, how is taking a 4 hour exam every other day for 3 -5 months ludicrous. You yourself self said you studied for 5 months and it was perfect... How many hours a day did you study for? I bet a good number of them were 4.5+ hour days. Oh, and since he has spent 6-8 months studying, how long do you think his reviews are going to take on the off days? More than 2 hours?
So this ludicrous schedule is (3) 4.5 hour days a week, (3) two hour days a week, (1) rest day a week for 3 or 4 months, a ludicrous total of 19.5 hours a week of studying time for 3 - 4 months leading up to the exam. What does that sound like? Hmmm.. like the SDN 3 or 4 month schedule minus some.
Yeah ludicrous...
In reading my response... I think I was a "Richard"... handshake to you mcloaf.
There is no point starting 1 year early. If you really want to do some preparations you could start reading science magazines and classic novels to increase reading speed and get accustomed to more challenging passages.
I am definitely into studying light for one year before my 3-4 months heavy studying. I guess, train rides to and from school will only be for reading The New York Times 🙂 Shooting for a super VR score!!!I'm taking the MCAT for the first time next summer. Is it too early to start doing light study for it? If not, can anyone direct me towards a good 1 year MCAT study schedule?
I disagree with everyone saying 1 year is too far in advance. There is so much practice material out there, that if you are dedicated could really benefit you. If you are planning to do content review for a year... yes that is a bad idea, but if you have the time, energy, and money, I would doing your content review with practice problems spread through out. Then EK 1001 books, then you could move on to TPR books and/or Kaplan quizzes/question bank. Then I would do TBR passages, as general thought says these are the best. You could finish all of that in 6 to 9 months and then just take practice tests every other day up until your test for the last 3-5 months, reviewing the exam on the other days.
I think a lot of the negative attention is that a lot of people wish they had studied more but didn't have the time/discipline. This is arguably the biggest test of your life, why not study for it as much as you can. I would sacrifice ECs for it, but if you are doing practice passages for the majority of the time, why not? You will just become more comfortable with the material and get a better score. With the GS exams, coupled with an online Kaplan or PR course, and the AAMC exams, you could slam out 30+ practice exams in your last 3 or 4 months before the exam at a leisurely pace.
My vote is go for it and don't let the naysayers on here drag you down. I wish I had done something like this...