- Joined
- Oct 7, 2018
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 3
Last edited:
Even still...retaking a 126 just portrays perfectionism...in not a good light. IDK that acceptance statistics for Canadians.I retook a 126. The other sections were more or less maintained.
I retook a 517 and got a 519 this time. I'm Canadian and I retook for CARS. I realize retaking a 517 is heresy in these parts, but I have absolutely zero regret. I achieved exactly my goal-- I increased my CARS to a 130 while retaining my scores in the other sections.
That being said, I do plan on applying to US schools next cycle and am wondering how it would reflect on me that I took a 517 and only scored a 2-point increase on a retake? I mean if it results in schools questioning my judgement that would be unfortunate, but so be it. But I had a reason for retaking, and I ended up doing justice to that reason. Anyways, how would schools look at it?
Did not know this - in light of CARS being most important in Canadian schools, you should be able to explain it away. Sorry for the ignorance, I agree with @Sunbodi and @Newyear in light of that. You just NEED to make sure it is in every application somewhereI am not sure how this works in Canada, I know in the US the CARS score is the least valued subject. If it is honestly true that you were eliminated at the majority of schools based on a screening process due to your cars score even with a 517 MCAT then I think that could be easily explainable in an essay to the US schools.
Your judgment will be questioned by some schools.I retook a 517 and got a 519 this time. I'm Canadian and I retook for CARS. I realize retaking a 517 is heresy in these parts, but I have absolutely zero regret. I achieved exactly my goal-- I increased my CARS to a 130 while retaining my scores in the other sections.
That being said, I do plan on applying to US schools next cycle and am wondering how it would reflect on me that I took a 517 and only scored a 2-point increase on a retake? I mean if it results in schools questioning my judgement that would be unfortunate, but so be it. But I had a reason for retaking, and I ended up doing justice to that reason. Anyways, how would schools look at it?
So I should probably also add that I had a 126, which, in my home province of Ontario, essentially disqualifies me from 2 schools, out of 5 total in my province. It's absolutely nothing to do with thinking my score wasn't good enough. It had to do with just meeting thresholds.
Edit: Thank you to the later replies that realized the circumstance of having a 126 CARS living where I live. It could not possilby be poor judgement, given that my improvement from a 126 --> 130 brought me from nearly-impossible odds to very good odds at one school, and pushed me past the cutoffs for another. I asked this question wondering how others would perceive my judgement. Hopefully I'll have a chance to explain myself in my essays.
I think your problem is more than that. The schools in the States will wonder why you apply here instead of Canada. If you say you only want to go to the States, it’s obviously false because you retook a 126 in CARS to increase your chance in Ontario. Or if you mention no such thing, then the schools in the States will wonder why you retook a 517.I retook a 126. The other sections were more or less maintained.
I think your problem is more than that. The schools in the States will wonder why you apply here instead of Canada. If you say you only want to go to the States, it’s obviously false because you retook a 126 in CARS to increase your chance in Ontario. Or if you mention no such thing, then the schools in the States will wonder why you retook a 517.
-I retook a 517 and got a 519 this time. I increased my CARS to a 130 while retaining my scores in the other sections.
- am wondering how it would reflect on me that I took a 517 and only scored a 2-point increase on a retake?
OP, contrary to what other posters here stated I would not see a problem with it.
Mention to adcoms [if asked] that interview you that the CARS section is the most important section in Canadian medical school admissions and that is why you retook it.
You did not have bad judgement. I think some of the posters here might not understand how the Canadian system works.
This. Experienced adcomms from schools that accept Canadians have an idea of how the Canadian system works.I wouldnt bring it up at all unless someone asks explicitly and if they do just tell them you're Canadian and 130 CARS is the name of the game for Canadian schools.
I am not sure how this works in Canada, I know in the US the CARS score is the least valued subject. If it is honestly true that you were eliminated at the majority of schools based on a screening process due to your cars score even with a 517 MCAT then I think that could be easily explainable in an essay to the US schools.
Source? That's not what I have heard.
Source? That's not what I have heard.
CARS is the stupidest section ever. Completely a mind-f*ck game.
CARS is the stupidest section ever. Completely a mind-f*ck game.
anyone scoring 13x is basically getting lucky.As a 126 CARS score holder, I AGREE!
anyone scoring 13x is basically getting lucky.
anyone scoring 13x is basically getting lucky.
I think you'll probably be fine at the majority of schools, especially given that you have a genuine reason for retaking the exam that goes beyond "I thought I could do better".
nah, lucky. because CARS has test-retest reliability of almost zero.Or well prepared.
I don’t think so. I got >130 on all FL practice tests and on the real thing.nah, lucky. because CARS has test-retest reliability of almost zero.
Same 131-132 on all FLs and the real thing.I don’t think so. I got >130 on all FL practice tests and on the real thing.
I retook a 517 and got a 519 this time. I'm Canadian and I retook for CARS. I realize retaking a 517 is heresy in these parts, but I have absolutely zero regret. I achieved exactly my goal-- I increased my CARS to a 130 while retaining my scores in the other sections.
That being said, I do plan on applying to US schools next cycle and am wondering how it would reflect on me that I took a 517 and only scored a 2-point increase on a retake? I mean if it results in schools questioning my judgement that would be unfortunate, but so be it. But I had a reason for retaking, and I ended up doing justice to that reason. Anyways, how would schools look at it?
So I should probably also add that I had a 126, which, in my home province of Ontario, essentially disqualifies me from 2 schools, out of 5 total in my province. It's absolutely nothing to do with thinking my score wasn't good enough. It had to do with just meeting thresholds.
Edit: Thank you to the later replies that realized the circumstance of having a 126 CARS living where I live. It could not possilby be poor judgement, given that my improvement from a 126 --> 130 brought me from nearly-impossible odds to very good odds at one school, and pushed me past the cutoffs for another. I asked this question wondering how others would perceive my judgement. Hopefully I'll have a chance to explain myself in my essays.
Well, for most people it’s very inaccurate. I only did one FL and then the real thing. Got both 130. But if you look at the general population of test takers, the retest reliability is very low. Personally of all the standardized tests I took, LSAT, GRE, GMAT, SAT and MCAT, CARS is the worst reading section. In all reading sections of the standardized tests, I all scored in the 98 to 100 percentile. CARS is really not a reading test but a very strange IQ test.Same 131-132 on all FLs and the real thing.
Well, for most people it’s very inaccurate. I only did one FL and then the real thing. Got both 130. But if you look at the general population of test takers, the retest reliability is very low. Personally of all the standardized tests I took, LSAT, GRE, GMAT, SAT and MCAT, CARS is the worst reading section. In all reading sections of the standardized tests, I all scored in the 98 to 100 percentile. CARS is really not a reading test but a very strange IQ test.
Edit: for all the tests except MCAT, I knew I aced the reading right after, but for CARS I had no idea how I did. It’s a test of how your bias affects your understanding rather than testing your real comprehension.
I think that in order to claim that you are good at CARS, or good at any other section for that matter, you have to consistently be able to do well. So yes there will always be a person who gets lucky and guesses a couple questions right to get a 130>, but someone who is really good at CARS never has to guess and can consistently score well. Personally I usually felt pretty confident after I completed a CARS section, so I don't buy it when people say that CARS is all luck. Same thing with BB and CP, I got 132 for all of my FLs and the real thing.Well, for most people it’s very inaccurate. I only did one FL and then the real thing. Got both 130. But if you look at the general population of test takers, the retest reliability is very low. Personally of all the standardized tests I took, LSAT, GRE, GMAT, SAT and MCAT, CARS is the worst reading section. In all reading sections of the standardized tests, I all scored in the 98 to 100 percentile. CARS is really not a reading test but a very strange IQ test.
Edit: for all the tests except MCAT, I knew I aced the reading right after, but for CARS I had no idea how I did. It’s a test of how your bias affects your understanding rather than testing your real comprehension.
Lol, I have a JD/MBA/MS now. No PhD.Were you a career Kaplan tutor or just gunning to be one of the elite MD/PhD/JD/MBAs? I'm still trying to wrap my head around why someone would take all of those different exams.
you are an exception to the rule, so am I. But for most people, the section is quite inaccurate. alright, we got that you scored a 524+ lol.I think that in order to claim that you are good at CARS, or good at any other section for that matter, you have to consistently be able to do well. So yes there will always be a person who gets lucky and guesses a couple questions right to get a 130>, but someone who is really good at CARS never has to guess and can consistently score well. Personally I usually felt pretty confident after I completed a CARS section, so I don't buy it when people say that CARS is all luck. Same thing with BB and CP, I got 132 for all of my FLs and the real thing.
No you don't understand- Canadian schools place a disproportionate emphasis on CARS.Even still...retaking a 126 just portrays perfectionism...in not a good light. IDK that acceptance statistics for Canadians.
My friend got 130+ on all FLs and then dropped to 127 ;/I don’t think so. I got >130 on all FL practice tests and on the real thing.
it's a shame that in Canada they look at the section where luck plays the biggest role.My friend got 130+ on all FLs and then dropped to 127 ;/
Overall I think the woeful Canadian CARS situation is more well-discussed on r/MCAT
So would you not recommend a Canadian to rewrite a 517 mcat with a 126 cars if their goals are US med schools but are still applying to Canadian schools?Your judgment will be questioned by some schools.
Canadians will be the only people I'll be OK with retaking a high unexpired score.So would you not recommend a Canadian to rewrite a 517 mcat with a 126 cars if their goals are US med schools but are still applying to Canadian schools?
anyone scoring 13x is basically getting lucky.
CARS is the stupidest section ever. Completely a mind-f*ck game.