- Joined
- Aug 25, 2016
- Messages
- 159
- Reaction score
- 274
Last edited:
I go to a school with a 1.5 year preclinical and Step 1 taken after our clinical year (so 2.5 years in). I've read that people like to take Step 2 CK after their clinical year when it's all still fresh in their head.
Given the recent announcement making Step 1 P/F and the likely consequence that Step 2 CK will replace it as the important exam for purposes of stratifying applicants, as well as the utility of knowing where you stand score-wise before making plans on specialties and which places to apply to, would it be reasonable or even preferable to tackle Step 1 and 2CK in relatively quick succession following the clinical year? That way you'd have your CK results back ASAP and could plan from there.
One other question:
Does a solid foundation of Step 1 knowledge later facilitate better results on shelf exams or Step 2 CK?
Thanks in advance.
My school does the exact same thing as yours (if we don’t go to the same one lol), and I can tell you the answers to your questions are yes and yes. To expand, It actually goes both ways. Step 1 knowledge most def helps for Shelf’s and step 2ck. But shelves help for step 1 a lot too. It actually benefited us since step 1 was the more important exam, it gave us a chance to “practice” taking nbme exams with the shelf exams In order to be more familiar with the material and exam format for step 1. Now with the advent of p/f step 1, students with a 1.5 curriculum will need to take step 1 and then ck in quick succession to get a score before aways and stuff.
Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile