D
deleted1038378
Last edited by a moderator:
You can still re-apply after having been accepted to a program, but it will bring unwanted attention to your application. So if you truly would rather be rejected than accepted to these two programs, then withdraw from them now.I'm on 4 WLs with no As. I am deciding to withdraw from 2 and reapply if I don't get into the other 2. I just have negative feelings about those schools after the interview day and not sure if I'll be happy there for 4 years. I am also confident that my app is much stronger this time. But am worried that this will be a red flag since I read you cannot reapply if your accepted, so I'm not sure how a WL is viewed.
This^^^^^.You can still re-apply after having been accepted to a program, but it will bring unwanted attention to your application. So if you truly would rather be rejected than accepted to these two programs, then withdraw from them now.
Med schools do NOT have the ability to see if you're on wait lists, nor do apps ask about themI'm on 4 WLs with no As. I am deciding to withdraw from 2 and reapply if I don't get into the other 2. I just have negative feelings about those schools after the interview day and not sure if I'll be happy there for 4 years. I am also confident that my app is much stronger this time. But am worried that this will be a red flag since I read you cannot reapply if your accepted, so I'm not sure how a WL is viewed.
Thank you all very much. I am really debating on withdrawing or not cause I udnerstand the difficult and importance of getting an A and a WL is still a shot. But I have this feeling that I will regret going to one school I didn't like and always thinking about "what if" I reapplied and did I shooot myself in the foot based on this fear of not getting in again. I think I'm in a somewhat unique situation in which I am confident my app is much stronger this time around. I have a 3.8+/520+ (LM76-77). But I applied with the bare minimum ECs hoping I'd get in somewhere. I got 2 top 20 iis, and 4 mid-tier iis. But after this cycle, I got 4 WLs and 2 Rs, I'm starting to think that it was my ECs that were holding me back since I even got R'ed at what I thought was my best interview. I'm going to call these schools that R'ed me, but I have a strong feeling it is due to a lack of shadowing (mentioned during my interview). I applied with 300hrs research, 300hrs clincial volunteering, 30hrs shadowing, 100hrs leadership, 200hrs nonclinical. This year I will add 200hrs research with 1 publication (possibly 3 by June), 300hrs clinical volunteering, 120hrs shadowing, and 150hrs non-clinical. I also feel that all my new accomplishments will be wasted if I don't reapply in a sense.
But I have this feeling that I will regret going to one school I didn't like and always thinking about "what if" I reapplied and did I shooot myself in the foot based on this fear of not getting in again.
At your schools, is the interview that determines whether someone gets a R/WL/A at that point or do you go back and review the whole app? I felt like I got rejected at some of my better interviews and WL'ed at some of my worse (one interviewer told me I didn't have enough shadowing and research). So I'm confused if it was the interview holding me back or a combo of interview being alright but ECs not being enough to pull me over to A vs. WL.
You got 4 interviews with what was by your account a very standard application which isn't bad at all, so I doubt the issue was with that or your narrative presentation. Most likely interviewI was not too concerned about clinical volunteering, but more about shadowing and research. I read that you really need 50hrs of shadowing to check the box and I only had 30 (and split between 3 docs). Is this not a gap fulfilled? Also, I think my research was lacking since most schools that interviewed me were research heavy. I agree that I am cookie-cutter, but I do have a narrative that I think I can weave better if I rewrite my stuff and include current stuff.
You're missing their point lol.. 30 hours of shadowing is fine. It's perhaps slightly below average but still fairly average. If you're a bit below average in many other regards too, then yes, it's an issue, but it alone hasn't hurt you significantly. By all means improve your application so you improve your chances, but my impression is that the app isn't a serious issueDid you have something very compelling our stand-out about your app? How were your stats? 7+ As is not typical of anyone and puts you at the very top. Perhaps you made up for your lack of shadowing in other areas?