D
deleted973577
Last edited by a moderator:
True, but did they first send LOIs and then ask for the scholarships after receiving As that did not include one? OP seems to be asking about the ethics of first sending an LOI and then, if he gets a A, saying thanks, now I need money because I really can't justify paying full price to attend. On the other hand, I think it's understood that if he includes his desire for money in his LOI it will be DOA.I read threads from last year and multiple people were pulled from T20 WLs and given scholarships after May 1
Here’s my dilemma:
School A has kindly offered me a very large scholarship that almost covers tuition, definitely can’t turn it down.
I am on the waitlist at Columbia, and from what I’ve gathered, you essentially need to send a letter of intent to have a chance at making it off. The issue is, I wouldn’t choose Columbia if I had to pay 250k more to attend, so I don’t think it’s ethical to write a letter of intent if the cost of Columbia is set in stone. However, if there’s a chance that schools still match scholarships even when pulling off the waitlist, then I would consider sending in a letter of intent (I know it seems silly for a school to do this rather than just move on to the next WL applicant, but someone I know claims they were pulled off the Perelman waitlist and got them to match a very high merit scholarship).
I guess I’m just wondering if anyone has experience/knowledge on this matter, or advice on what I should do.
do you know if this person sent in a letter of intent or interest?someone I know claims they were pulled off the Perelman waitlist and got them to match a very high merit scholarship