- Joined
- Sep 22, 2016
- Messages
- 637
- Reaction score
- 366
Stanfordpackardvoice.com

Think about this the next time you are busting your behind at WG and CVS.
PSLF qualifying too I believe.
Why don’t pharmacy workers unionize? That is the only reason wages are this high
This. Being a nurse is a lot tougher than a pharmacist. The stuff they do is incredible.It’s absolutely a new grad market for nurses, like…holy cow.
But I will say, it’s tough work, I wouldn’t be able to do it. Nurses earn every penny given what they deal with.
It’s probably more than half of what a Stanford IM attending would make and at least double a resident.It’s supply and demand. Nurses are in demand that’s why they are making as much. Pharmacists can’t even if we unionize.
Also that salary while good, isn’t life changing in that part of California.
Why doesn’t all labor unionize? Politics (and concentrated efforts by employers) would be my guess.Why don’t pharmacy workers unionize? That is the only reason wages are this high
i think it’s because if physicians unionized, they would be demonized, called greedy etc. by the public to an even greater extent than they are already.Why doesn’t all labor unionize? Politics (and concentrated efforts by employers) would be my guess.
Also that salary while good, isn’t life changing in that part of California.
I actually called some union organizers in my area a few months ago and couldn't get any to call me back.Good question - someone needs to find a voice and start organizing.
I actually called some union organizers in my area a few months ago and couldn't get any to call me back.
We did get a few dropping by stores trying to gauge tech interest shortly after, not sure if it was related. The techs didn't really show any interest though.
Shane jermonski (sp?) the accidental pharmacist on FB, has been trying, I just don't know how you do it unless you get the a big union to take it on with the structure already builtWell count me in - if it gets off the ground please let us know
It’s probably more than half of what a Stanford IM attending would make and at least double a resident.
The peds attendings are almost assuredly making less. I know of a peds heme-onc attending (3 year residency and 3 year fellowship) that was offered 130K a year at an academic California program.
As much as nurses should get paid for what they deserve, this is rediculous.Yeah, but it’s definitely made up for in future income. Kind of a weird snapshot comparison.
Yeah, but it’s definitely made up for in future income. Kind of a weird snapshot comparison.
What's made up for in future income? Academic peds attendings are notoriously underpaid.
These are not residents or fellows. Attendings
As much as nurses should get paid for what they deserve, this is rediculous.
50-70 k is what they deseve with maybe 80-90k if they are really experienced.
Most family medicine doctors make only in low 200's. They have a lot more training than the nurses. Did harder residencies, did multiple board exams and probably did the most demanding eduction. Look at nursing track... and i dont know how that even compares to this...
I think the RN market is much more complex And that unionization isn’t a significan’t factor in increasing RN wages. RN’s have multiple escape routes from clinical medicine, pressure from hospitals with the FLEX systems and COVID have pushed the RN labor market to other things. I would also argue that fewer people go into nursing actually plan on being a nurse.I think the main point is that most nursing salaries are not organic but rather the products of unionization (ie extortion).
Without profit, there often isn't a business, so long-term everyone loses. You can delay profit, but eventually everyone wants to get paid. Even Wall Street darling Amazon, which famously operated without profits for decades to increase market share, isn't immune. Recent Amazon stock declines based on a loss show the market wasn't having it.Profit only exists if the employee is being extorted!
I was going to comment on that. It isn't "organic" but "exploitative" and anyone who thinks otherwise is naive.Notice how when the union negotiated higher wages it’s “extortion” but when the employers use their power to keep wages low it’s “organic”.
Who is extorting who in the employment arrangement? Profit only exists if the employee is being extorted!
Or conflicted. While I don't think it's exploitive, I am not an unconflicted party.I was going to comment on that. It isn't "organic" but "exploitative" and anyone who thinks otherwise is naive.
This. Being a nurse is a lot tougher than a pharmacist. The stuff they do is incredible.
I mean hedge fund managers provide pretty much zero value to society and require minimal schooling/training relative to HCPs, but there they are out-earning everyone here.
Welcome to life. This is like when people complain nfl qbs get paid too muchSame with a lot of tech workers in the region. They get paid as much as these Stanford nurses or more to work 15-20 hours a week from home on projects that contribute little or nothing to society.
Welcome to life. This is like when people complain nfl qbs get paid too much
And they make near/at family doc salary. Nuts. These nurses are pretending to be bootleg doctors with the training of a nurse.I think the main point is that most nursing salaries are not organic but rather the products of unionization (ie extortion).
Same with a lot of tech workers in the region. They get paid as much as these Stanford nurses or more to work 15-20 hours a week from home on projects that contribute little or nothing to society.
Although I agree with most of this - I don't think the milenials are the cause for the downfall of the unions in Chicago, I was living downstate illinois (non-union) at the time of the wags strike in 2005. That one falls on gen-x who caved to the almighty $$(Exasperated Sigh). Pharmacists were unionized in the 1980s through early 2000s. CAPHA under Johnson was directly why the CALPLEX was kept as a way of controlling labor supply. The major reason behind the wage increases of the early 2000s was due to two strikes, one in Chicago and one in NYC that so crippled Walgreens and CVS that major changes in the labor allocation and tech ratios were done.
The Millennials threw that all away and deserve what they get. I have no problem with the current state of management affairs as there are always new, poor, stupid pharmacists ready to replace.
It's so bad now that there are now mandated staffing levels from the Board, because we can't organize ourselves.
Physicians never needed to as their professional organizations work for them. Read The Social Transformation of American Medicine to understand what the AMA actually is.
C’mon guys, perspective (40hrs/week no OT):
Annual wages (rounded):
Minimum wage: $31k
Security guards: $70-80k
Pharm tech: $70-90k but most I know boosted their income to >$120k with available OT
Low income legal definition, 2021 (family of 4): $118k
RN new grad as above: $142k
Pharmacists: $180k-$220k
People in tech: $200k-$400k avg
Source: people I know, not scientific, cross checked with public data (all State of California employees have their compensation published by law).