D
deleted1115000
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2014
- Messages
- 4,226
- Reaction score
- 15,039
Not to turn this into a political thread. But are you really expecting government officials to do anything with readily available and verifiable data when we’re electing the *****s that are currently in power? Seriously think about the last few years.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2017
- Messages
- 410
- Reaction score
- 408
To some extent.
They use these data the same way they use other public opinion polls. In other words, they don't use the data to make big decisions ( like choosing the president), but it can be used to justify some decisions.
If they want to make a decision, by reading online forums they can get a sense that how much resistance they will encounter.
True that they have access to average rads compensation but they don't have a realistic view of the details. For example, if on all forums MSK rads complain left and right about the complexity of MSK studies, the officials know that if they decrease the RVU for MSK studies, they will see a lot of dissatisfaction.
Afterall, every change in the system should not result in massive complaints.
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
- Messages
- 1,742
- Reaction score
- 2,879
There are a finite amount of dollars at play.
Typically though, CMS will use input from the RUC surveys to determine how certain CPT codes are paid.
What Is the RUC? - PMC
We describe a crucial but little-known constituent of the Medicare payment system.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The RUC survey can play a crucial role. If enough people answer incorrectly and downplay the work/difficulty, that will be reflected in possible cuts.
It's important to stay involved in your national societies specifically relating to coding because this is where some of the advocacy occurs.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2016
- Messages
- 955
- Reaction score
- 1,052
When will I ever receive a RUC survey?
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2002
- Messages
- 863
- Reaction score
- 651
Think its basically spread sheets and more importantly, the zero-sums game approach (eg. increase in reimbursement needs to be balanced with cuts)...Never a fan/member of the AMA until recently. They are (apparently) tackling medicare reform head-on. While I would encourage being an ACR member and donating to RADPAC, there is strength in numbers by uniting with other subspecialties. I'm going to give the AMA a few years and see what happens
Why We Fight: Reforming Medicare Payment
The AMA is leading the charge to reform the Medicare payment system, advocating against payment cuts, working with Congress and pushing for urgent reform.
www.ama-assn.org
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2017
- Messages
- 410
- Reaction score
- 408
AMA has been always anti-specialists esp anti-radiologists.Think its basically spread sheets and more importantly, the zero-sums game approach (eg. increase in reimbursement needs to be balanced with cuts)...Never a fan/member of the AMA until recently. They are (apparently) tackling medicare reform head-on. While I would encourage being an ACR member and donating to RADPAC, there is strength in numbers by uniting with other subspecialties. I'm going to give the AMA a few years and see what happens
Why We Fight: Reforming Medicare Payment
The AMA is leading the charge to reform the Medicare payment system, advocating against payment cuts, working with Congress and pushing for urgent reform.
They are usually bunch of family physicians who try to bump up primary care salaries at the expense of specialist. The specialties that make most of their income from office visit and inpatient services benefit somehow from AMA lobbying since both groups have these things in common. However, for specialties that make most of their income from procedures, the AMA in fact lobby against them. The ultimate goal of AMA is to make salaries flat across the board or decrease the gap between office visits and procedures reimbursements. Something like paying all physicians similar rate/hour. Japan has a similar system.
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2002
- Messages
- 863
- Reaction score
- 651
In general I share some of your sentiments, and would add that at times they actuall seemed anti-physician...They now have a "Recovery Plan for American Physicians". CMS payment reform is a big chunk of this. Based on the AMA webinars that I have heard, they are viewing this as a global physician issue (not breaking it down by primary care versus specialists-see below power point slide)...Many specialty professional societies (including ACR) are on board. Think the trigger was in part due to Covid-burn out and ongoing baby boomer physician retirement (double whammy actually as they will add to overall HC demand as new medicare pts...I am cautiously/skeptically optimistic and will support them in the short-term and see what happens.
Fighting for physicians
The AMA is your powerful ally, focused on addressing the issues important to you, so you can focus on what matters most—patients.
www.ama-assn.org
