Couldn't agree more with the previous post. I don't post often on this site but I do spend eons more time than I should reading other people's posts and I have to say that an absurd amount of emphasis is placed on raw GPA on SDN without other considerations. My undergraduate cumulative GPA was a 3.3. My science is somewhere between 3.4-3.5. This, by SDN user standards, is not good. However, I can't help but feel like this is missing a HUGE part of the story. I went to a top national university in Cornell which for much of my tenure had a grade inflation policy and additionally, I have a strong upward trend in my grades.
That said, you may have a 3.8 GPA but your low MCAT score might potentially be highlighting some aspect that was missing in your education. Your poor grammar (except vs. accept- look into it) also seems to hint at this. At my school, we were taught to think critically and this is a huge aspect of the MCAT examination.
I'd like to make it clear that my purpose in this response is not to take shots at the original poster. I wish you and all of the other people on this site the best of luck in their medical aspirations. I might be completely wrong about you and please forgive me if I am, but too often people on this site fail to consider the myriad of other factors that medical schools consider in looking at one's peripherals. My father is a professor and he has explained to me on many occasions the prevalence in grading disparity between academic institutions at different levels of prestige. In laymans terms, It is NOT all about GPA!!!