The "advanced" bio sequence given my school that suffices as 'one-year' of biology has an un-curved class average of 57% currently, pretty far in the term. Typical?
The "advanced" bio sequence given my school that suffices as 'one-year' of biology has an un-curved class average of 57% currently, pretty far in the term. Typical?
The "advanced" bio sequence given my school that suffices as 'one-year' of biology has an un-curved class average of 57% currently, pretty far in the term. Typical?
it's hard for us to say if that's typical, because different professors at different schools run things different ways.
This sounds pretty typical of bio weed-out class though, so who knows...At my school, in the second orgo I test last semester, several people got 0. The professor gave them 7 points for writing their name, which became 2% on the test. Highest was something like 90, average was 60s, people were pissed. Curve for the course wasn't too big but fair, I think 13% got As to A-'s.
The year before, a (different) prof gave a final with material they hadn't covered yet but were supposed to "be able to figure it out". Average was a 30. My friend got a 35 and went out celebrating.
0? Wow, now that's just the students fault.
The "advanced" bio sequence given my school that suffices as 'one-year' of biology has an un-curved class average of 57% currently, pretty far in the term. Typical?
I don't know, I don't think so... It was around 10 students who got zeros. If someone who's taken the course for months can realistically get the same grade as someone who knows nothing about organic chemistry, I think there's something wrong with the teaching...
The "advanced" bio sequence given my school that suffices as 'one-year' of biology has an un-curved class average of 57% currently, pretty far in the term. Typical?
.The "advanced" bio sequence given my school that suffices as 'one-year' of biology has an un-curved class average of 57% currently, pretty far in the term. Typical?