There is a doc in town who tells his patients that might have had an allergy to the flu shot at one point in time to get 1/2 now and then 1/2 a few days later (so .25ml and then .25ml). I think it sounds so stupid, but most of them are old ladies who had an "allergy" to the shot at one point in time, like 10 years ago. Generally it seems like it's not a legit allergy or there was some compounding variable (ie oh yeah and I'm allergic to sulfa and I was on Bactrim at the time). We do it, and think it's bogus, but I'm just curious if anyone else has seen anything like this?
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
a 1/2 flu shot
Started by fauxden
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Would a 1/2 dose even prevent or mitigate a serious reaction? I doubt it. Do the insurances pay for you to give a 1/2 dose x2?
There is a doc in town who tells his patients that might have had an allergy to the flu shot at one point in time to get 1/2 now and then 1/2 a few days later (so .25ml and then .25ml). I think it sounds so stupid, but most of them are old ladies who had an "allergy" to the shot at one point in time, like 10 years ago. Generally it seems like it's not a legit allergy or there was some compounding variable (ie oh yeah and I'm allergic to sulfa and I was on Bactrim at the time). We do it, and think it's bogus, but I'm just curious if anyone else has seen anything like this?
No, it is plain stupid.
i would deny each script and tell the old ladies to go back to the doc and get the shot there since they're "allergic"There is a doc in town who tells his patients that might have had an allergy to the flu shot at one point in time to get 1/2 now and then 1/2 a few days later (so .25ml and then .25ml). I think it sounds so stupid, but most of them are old ladies who had an "allergy" to the shot at one point in time, like 10 years ago. Generally it seems like it's not a legit allergy or there was some compounding variable (ie oh yeah and I'm allergic to sulfa and I was on Bactrim at the time). We do it, and think it's bogus, but I'm just curious if anyone else has seen anything like this?
CDC used to recommend giving the shot in 2 doses for patients with egg allergies, but not 1/2 at a time. It used to be 10% to see if they had a reaction and then give 90% 30mn later. But that was changed in 2011...
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6033a3.htm?s_cid=mm6033a3_w
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6033a3.htm?s_cid=mm6033a3_w
i would deny each script and tell the old ladies to go back to the doc and get the shot there since they're "allergic"
This.
No, it is plain stupid.
this times a million.