- Joined
- Nov 22, 2011
- Messages
- 511
- Reaction score
- 30
Out of the options available, there is a clear winner BUT since acetylcholinesterase is a common topic I have a question.
If acetylcholinesterase is applied, wouldn't it increase both ParaSympathetic and Sympathetic stimulation equally? Yes, sympathetic has epinephrine/nor at the effector junction but wouldn't the increased acetylcholine at the ganglionic junction increase the epinephrine at the effector?
I guess since the epinephrine can get broken down and the acetylcholine can't, the sympathetic motor junction would "run out" of epinephrine or burn out in a sense over time?
Just wondering why the continued stimulus of both S and PS ganglions wouldn't continually stimulate the motor junction despite what neurotransmitter it uses.
If acetylcholinesterase is applied, wouldn't it increase both ParaSympathetic and Sympathetic stimulation equally? Yes, sympathetic has epinephrine/nor at the effector junction but wouldn't the increased acetylcholine at the ganglionic junction increase the epinephrine at the effector?
I guess since the epinephrine can get broken down and the acetylcholine can't, the sympathetic motor junction would "run out" of epinephrine or burn out in a sense over time?
Just wondering why the continued stimulus of both S and PS ganglions wouldn't continually stimulate the motor junction despite what neurotransmitter it uses.