Could you elaborate on 3rd party FLs? Maybe their pros and cons? I have done 4 Kaplan FLs and plan to do some TPR FLs along the way as well (I have access to both company's FLs). I hope I haven't been wasting my time with Kaplan FLs. I understand they aren't regarded well here on SDN, but I want to hear more opinions on someone who has done multiple companies' FLs.
I'd be glad to.
First and foremost, I've done at least 3 to 4 exams per company to get a flavor of what they're like. Additionally, I researched (via SDN) which are the good and bad exams by a company. For example, NS FL 6 sucks. Don't bother with it lol.
Kaplan and Princeton
Pro:
-Lots of full lengths
Con:
-FL's suck.
-Far too difficult and not in the least bit accurate with respect to AAMC style
-Questions and passages aren't based on scientific journals (which AAMC passages are based on)
-Questions are impossible and the scores are super curved and not an accurate reflection of where you're really at
Examkrackers
Pro:
-Five FLs
-Style is okay
Cons:
-NO SCORE AVAILABLE AFTER TAKING AN EXAM: ONLY A PERCENTAGE OF WHAT YOU GOT CORRECT
-Still not representative of AAMC style to the fullest extent
-Passages and questions are way too indepth and not indepth enough in other areas
-While I respect the "diversity" within the exams, some random topics that are extremely low yield popped up - not quite necessarily a bad thing, but still much to frequent for my taste
-Difficult in the sense that you don't get an accurate representation of AAMC difficulty - yes the AAMC exams are hard (so is the MCAT...) but these are hard in the sense that the questions are detailed in obscure spots
NextStep
Pro:
-10 FL exams
-Style is pretty good
-Good quality questions
Cons:
-PRICE is huge
-Only 5 attempts per exam
-Despite 10 FLs, only 1 to 5 are worth doing - anything beyond is poor quality
-Explanations are kind of a bust and demoralizing (you'll be provided with a chart on how well students did and the difficulty of the problem; its heartbreaking seeing "the question rating is easy, 2% of testtakers got this question correct!"
Altius
-10 FL exams
-Style is perfect - on all 10 exams
-Amazing question style
-Entirely journal based: Passages are pulled from academic peer reviewed journals (just like AAMC)
-Question style is identical to AAMC
-Difficulty of questions and diversity of topics is on point with all the AAMC materials
-Unlimited attempts: This is a dealbreaker for me. If i'm paying a lot of money (100s of dollars) to be told I only have a few tries that's unacceptable. Additionally, you can customize the exam for whatever you're looking for, say untimed and only critical thinking physics/chemistry questions - this lets you hit your weakest topics without having to look through the entire exams for your specific needs
Cons:
-The verbal sections can be excessively brutal: getting 10 wrong and only scoring a 126 is garbage, not to mention the verbal passages and questions are way too hard - but hey, nobody's perfect
-Double edge sword here on diversity: Say a phys/chem section should include 25% physics, + or - 5%, you'll see that on various exams, some more physics, others less, but this is a pro because various testtakers report "omg the MCAT I took had like only gen chem and no physics on it wtf
🙁!!!!" so its pretty awesome
To learn more about why altius is better than other companies, see
here.
Also, while exam costs vary, I should say I snagged all 10 altius exams for $150 on a special promo they had. Even at full price ($300 for all 10), with unlimited attempts and the customizable features paired up with the best AAMC non-AAMC prep available, its worth every penny.