- Joined
- May 18, 2021
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 16
Took it today. What an absolute disaster of a test. For those who took it, what did you think of the multiple choice segment?
Cue Lee Rogers in 3....2.....1....why is ABPM even relevant if ABFAS has secured monopoly over podiatry privileges in each state? In some states they do not even consider ABPM for surgical privileges because ABFAS somehow got it written into the state statutes. Podiatry is ridiculous.
Next time you are near a mirror, close your eyes and spin around three times while saying Lee Rogers name repeatedly. If you do this, after midnight on the third Tuesday of the month, he will appear in the mirror and answer questions regarding the ABPM.Cue Lee Rogers in 3....2.....1....
ABPM helps the first few years out so you can be "board certified" for insurances and basic hospital privileges. That is a plus since most insurances and CAQH don't seem to understand "BQ" from ABFAS... most MDs are either certified or not (usually their 'eligible' just means they finished a residency/fellowship in that specialty but haven't taken the cert test yet).why is ABPM even relevant if ABFAS has secured monopoly over podiatry privileges in each state? In some states they do not even consider ABPM for surgical privileges because ABFAS somehow got it written into the state statutes. Podiatry is ridiculous.
Over 80% of DPMs will pass ABPM first try... the vast majority of those who flunk pass on re-take. Unless you really struggled in pod school, failed national boars, etc... you likely have nothing to worry about. ABFAS is another story.Took it today. What an absolute disaster of a test. For those who took it, what did you think of the multiple choice segment?
Took it today. What an absolute disaster of a test. For those who took it, what did you think of the multiple choice segment?
The American board of multiple specialties including podiatric and lower limb surgical repair with advanced orthoplastic reconstruction is a 100 percent legit board. Just sent 1 BTC to some Nigerian dude.The exam is hot garbage, just like every other money sucking exam in this profession.
The Highlight of the test was the surprise twist with "Review questions" section. The instructions on the computer at the beginning specifically said you could go back and review questions, but the actual test decided that wasn't needed and just skipped on to the next section.... combined with the multple spelling errors I had, the test is the crowning achievement of TFP's and pOdamitry.
But... 100% I will advertise myself as "Board Certified" if I pass so whatever ;-)
Was this ABFAS board qualifying exam?Sooo today ABFAS decided to send out ITE didactic exams without images. Exams scrapped, cancelled and rescheduled. This is one hell of a profession, let me tell ya.
Yes, for the didactic portion of the foot exam. Total embarrassment to the profession. How do you screw up your profession' board qualifying exam by not attaching pictures?Was this ABFAS board qualifying exam?
Yes, for the didactic portion of the foot exam. Total embarrassment to the profession. How do you screw up your profession' board qualifying exam by not attaching pictures?
This is a total embarrassment because a lot of people were relying on their board qualifying board results to get privileges in a lot of states. States where ABPM is not recognized. This could cost a lot of people jobs. This is egregious.Yes, for the didactic portion of the foot exam. Total embarrassment to the profession. How do you screw up your profession' board qualifying exam by not attaching pictures?
This is the most podiatry thing ever. I guarantee the person who made the rule that ABPM only allows you foot surgery privileges was another podiatrist who is ABFAS board certified. Has to beThen I took ABPM like last year - and it was just awful awful awful. That said, I can use it to get priviledges for everything but ankle surgery so maybe I should shutup.
The saddest part is that no one is even surprised that this happens in podiatry.
Nope it still just podiatry...It doesn't just happen in Podiatry. In 2020, the Bar exam for the State of PA was cancelled outright. Which meant that graduates had to wait a whole other year to sit for the exam. Which screwed the applicants out of a whole year of pay as a attorney rather than a legal secretary. Think about that for a moment.
Nope it still just podiatry...
- On July 9, 2020, the Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners announced that the in-person bar exam scheduled for September 9-10, 2020 (which was the rescheduled date for the exam that was to be administered in July) will not take place due to coronavirus concerns. Instead, the Board will administer a remote bar exam on October 5-7, 2020, which will consist of a 100-question multistate bar exam on October 6 and essay sections on October 5 and 7. In addition, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has approved a limited license program that allows July 2020 bar exam applicants to temporarily practice law under the supervision of an experienced lawyer.
- February 2021 Bar Exam: Remote.
Its more that it's a national issue. there are over a million lawyers in the usa. we are ~15k? So with a board certification acting higher than the licensing and training is an issue. Also our issues are routed in every step of the way from schooling, licensure, residency, and surgical certification. Then it doesnt stop once youre out with reimbursement and insurance issues.One of the Judges that helps administer the Bar exam in PA is one of my patients. What you posted was the plan. It didn't quite work out that way. What they put together couldn't handle all the people from the previous year who failed the exam, and all the new people wanting to sit for the exam. Also, according to her, the limited license program had many issues and wasn't as successful as expected. Kind of like having to sit for exam and realizing that the pictures in the exam weren't included.
So yeah, it's not just Podiatry. It's funny to me how people continually think it's just Podiatry. This happens all the time in many other professions. You know how when you're growing up, and you do something idiotic, you think you're the only one that can do something so stupid? You're not. Chances are, you aren't the first person to do something like that, and won't be the last. Same thing here.
The World is full of bad situations and crap. Thinking it only happens to us is shallow.
Its more that it's a national issue. there are over a million lawyers in the usa. we are ~15k? So with a board certification acting higher than the licensing and training is an issue. Also our issues are routed in every step of the way from schooling, licensure, residency, and surgical certification. Then it doesnt stop once youre out with reimbursement and insurance issues.
Defending the board quality of podiatry is laughable. Please stop.Every profession has its challenges. And they are mostly surmountable. If they aren't for an individual, they should consider another career path.
Defending the board quality of podiatry is laughable. Please stop.
I just love how as soon as ABFAS allowed in-training exams to be used for board qualification purposes, they added the stipulation that you have to pay $300 per exam, with 4 exams (2 didactic and 2 CBPS) for full qualification, to "convert" it for board qualification. So yeah, that's cool that I can take one less block of exams potentially, but they still bend you over for $300-$1200 for no real reason other than "conversion". Whatever the **** that is.The anesthesiologist is mad because he took USMLE 1,2,3 which are all real tests with real quality. If his board is crap he at least knows real tests are possible. The podiatrists are pounding out $900-2000 dog turds every other year.
You don't need wound care boards. Just read a book and don't be an idiot when doing wound careOn the other hand... at least the available wound care “boards” (most of them at least) are decently written, pretty straightforward and there are no hidden costs or other crap.
You don't need wound care boards. Just read a book and don't be an idiot when doing wound care
IMO non surgeons should not be wound care providers.This is what the wound care franchises think who employ NPs that took a 1 week seminar on “wound care”. We all know the great work that they do…
I’m not saying that wound care is rocket surgery but does require some common sense.
maybe ortho
Yeah. I agree. Hence the "maybe". They wont do it and I dont blame them.Good luck getting them in a wound care center…
I’ve helped our ortho with lower extremity wound care/grafts/flaps. They have zero interest in doing any of that themselves. It’s on to the next total knee.
I’ll edit your list, though I agree with it, to general surgery, podiatry, plastics, and derm.
IMO non surgeons should not be wound care providers.
You really have to understand whats going on under that wound and the only way to really understand is being a surgeon and opening these patients up on a routine basis.
That statement will ruffle some feathers but podiatry, general surgery, maybe ortho or derm should really be the only ones at a wound healing center. At least in my opinion.
Sure, but the biomechanics behind the reason for wounds is like voodoo magic to most wound care providers. Understanding bed sores or dehisced belly wounds is a lot different than understanding common foot ulcers. It's saddening to hear patients walk into my office and tell me how they have been treated for over a year for a hallux wound. Do a Keller, and the wound heals in two weeks. 5th met resection for those pesky 5th MPJ wounds that have been treated for months and months at wound care. I've done this so many times that the wound care center stopped sending me so many patients--they were losing patients and money!I don't understand this whole post. You don't need to be a surgeon to understand the basics of wound healing. You should be a surgeon to be doing debridements because of malpractice issues, but there are plenty of non-physicians out there who have a much better understanding of wounds than many surgeons I've met who claim to do "wound care". You also forgot to add in Vascular Surgery. I would not trust an Ortho or a Derm to do wound care. Many are just as clueless about wounds as your average PCP.
Sure, but the biomechanics behind the reason for wounds is like voodoo magic to most wound care providers. Understanding bed sores or dehisced belly wounds is a lot different than understanding common foot ulcers. It's saddening to hear patients walk into my office and tell me how they have been treated for over a year for a hallux wound. Do a Keller, and the wound heals in two weeks. 5th met resection for those pesky 5th MPJ wounds that have been treated for months and months at wound care. I've done this so many times that the wound care center stopped sending me so many patients--they were losing patients and money!
Gotcha, I interpreted it a different way I guess.I 100% agree with you, but that wasn't the gist of the post I was responding to.
Vascular surgeons are technically specialised general surgeons but I agree.I don't understand this whole post. You don't need to be a surgeon to understand the basics of wound healing. You should be a surgeon to be doing debridements because of malpractice issues, but there are plenty of non-physicians out there who have a much better understanding of wounds than many surgeons I've met who claim to do "wound care". You also forgot to add in Vascular Surgery. I would not trust an Ortho or a Derm to do wound care. Many are just as clueless about wounds as your average PCP.
I agree with all above.Wound care is generally done by the dumbest tools in our profession (on average). Some are better than others, but it is quite basic...
If it's a pressure wound, offload with proper DME/insoles.... debride/abx/I&D or amp/recon as necessary.
If it's an arterial wound, consult vascular... prevent infection in the meantime.
If it's venous/lymph, compress and elevate... debride or abx as necessary.
If it's a trauma wound, irrigate + abx ... debride/close/stabilize as necessary.
...imaging, biopsy, and consults (ID, endo, nutrition, derm, plastics, etc) are never bad on any appropriate wound to pad the chart and look for advice.
I swear this gets shorter every time I type it since wound care is so basic. I have no idea how so many people make it so complicated with "advanced" topicals and bandages and biologics that have squat for EBM.
I agree with all above.
The advanced biologics do have their place. Such as a chronic wound with small vessel disease with no vascular options. A dialysis patient with poor healing ability. An uncontrolled diabetic who shows up 30 min late EVERY visit with a 40oz 711 full on sugared soda (I have one now and its very frustrating) or XYZ.
But overall you are spot on IMO. Most wounds heal with pretty basic care.