Achiever's VS Real DAT

[flin5845]

---

Members do not see this ad.

How comparable is achiever's to the real DAT? Because I just took a natural science section and got completely @$$ rammed.

 

[heat28]

Which of the tests did u take and how did u do?

I recently took Achiever Test 1 NS and got Bio -17, GC -18, Oc -19.

I don't really know what to think about it. Doesn't seem too good

 

[flin5845]

Which of the tests did u take and how did u do?

I recently took Achiever Test 1 NS and got Bio -17, GC -18, Oc -19.

I don't really know what to think about it. Doesn't seem too good

I took Test 2 and got Bio-16 GC-15 OC-17.....awful

 

[heat28]

keep plugging away at it and learn from your mistakes!!! When do u take the DAT?

 

[UCLAfailure]

Don't worry, the achiever has the tendency to ass ram everyone. For Natural Science, I feel that the achiever is slightly harder than the real thing. The PAT though, is WAY harder than the real thing. Math is only slightly harder and Reading Comprehension was right on the mark.
In Achieve I got 18 for NS and 21 on the real thing.

 

[flin5845]

Thanks guys.

I was really upset about ochem, because I thought this would be my best subject.

I took another ochem test because I was mad about what I made.

I focused a little more and pulled out an 18 on OC..

My biggest problem is trying to depict their short hand structures.

Does anyone know how the structures on the real DAT are? Like actual structures vs the short hand?