Step II Acid-base disturbances

Started by DrPettans
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

DrPettans

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
When we have a metabolic acidosis or metabolic alkalosis, we should also consider if there is a secondary respiratory acid-base disturbance aswell.

If we have a metabolic acidosis, we then use the winter's formula (HCO3 x 1.5 + 8 +/- 2), that gives us an expected CO2 level for that given HCO3. If patient's actual CO2 is higher or lower than expected, there is a secondary respiratory acidosis (patient's CO2 is higher than expected) or secondary respiratory alkalosis (patient's CO2 is lower than expected).

On the other hand, if we have a metabolic alkalosis, we use this other formula: (HCO3 x 0.8) + 20 +/- 2.
And again, if patient's CO2 is lower than expected according to that formula, there's a secondary respiratory alkalosis, or if patient's CO2 is higher than expected according to that formula, there's a secondary respiratory acidosis.

First of all: is that correct?

Second of all: if that is correct, look at this case:

ABG shows pH=7.5, CO2 45, O2 86 & HCO3 36 what's the acid-base disturbance here?

answer: There is a primary metabolic alkalosis (too much HCO3 makes pH higher than normal), and now, if we apply the second formula given above, 0.8x36 +20 +/- 2 = expected CO2 should be somewhere between 48 and 50, but it's 45, therefore lower than expected for that given HCO3, meaning pt has a secondary respiratory alkalosis.

Is that correct? Because the thing is this is a question from Medquest, and in the video the teacher says that applying that fomula there is not a secondary respiratory disturbance

Thank you
 
Your metabolic alkalosis formula is different from what I learned🙁0.7*rise in HCO3)+40 but the values turned out to be the same.
And your assumption is correct





Sent from my SM-N920P using SDN mobile