Adductor canal block

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

BLADEMDA

Full Member
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
22,639
Reaction score
9,716
There is more evidence now that a proximal adductor canal block gets the nerve to the vastus medialus and the saphenous. It's an easy bock to do. Anyone putting a catheter in here? (Proximal adductor canal just under the sartorius musce).

Anyone doing a disal adductor canal block to just get the saphenous nerve with less probability of proximal spread?

Members don't see this ad.
 
There is more evidence now that a proximal adductor canal block gets the nerve to the vastus medialus and the saphenous. It's an easy bock to do. Anyone putting a catheter in here? (Proximal adductor canal just under the sartorius musce).

Anyone doing a disal adductor canal block to just get the saphenous nerve with less probability of proximal spread?

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=913992&highlight=adductor+canal+block

Me neither... at least for TKA's. I'll do it for tibial plates that will get a medial incision. Works great for those cases.

A competing orthopedic hospital about an hour away from where I am located is using them for all their TKA's. 😱 .... hooking them up to an on-Q pump and letting them ride for 48 hours. Apparently they have good results... but I remain skeptical.

Do them all the time for my saphenous blocks. More reliable IMO.
 
I haven't been doing catheters, but will do single shot adductor canal blocks for orthopods that are overly worried about quad dysfunction and want the patients up and walking multiple hundred of feets on POD 0 (TKA).

Results so far are not as good as femorals, but not shabby either. Need a good multimodal program (celebrex, gabapentin, tylenol, etc.) to make it work.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
We do adductor canal blocks regularly in order to get saphenous coverage supplementation to our popliteal blocks. We are doing them about mid thigh to the distal 1/3 area from ASIS to knee. Our experience has been that it isn't consistent enough to provide a surgical block, but that it works well for post-op pain. One of our Regional fellows is currently doing a study comparing adductor canal caths to fem caths for TKA's. Anecdotal reports so far are that they work so-so for TKA's. A few pts that had a fem cath for their first TKA and now got a adductor canal cath for their other TKA much preferred the fem cath. I personally have some concerns about how well a catheter will stay put in the adductor canal.
 
Anesth Analg. 2012 Dec;115(6):1467-70. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826af956. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
Technical communication: anatomy and clinical implications of ultrasound-guided selective femoral nerve block.
Ishiguro S, Yokochi A, Yoshioka K, Asano N, Deguchi A, Iwasaki Y, Sudo A, Maruyama K.
Source

Oyamada Memorial Spa Hospital, 5538-1 Yamada-cho, Yokkaichi Mie 512-1111, Japan. [email protected].
Abstract

In this study we evaluated the anatomic basis and clinical findings of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block performed close to the distal apex of the femoral triangle. Cadaver studies were conducted in 9 thighs of fresh bodies within 24 hours postmortem. In all cases, during injection of 10 mL of blue dye, the skin proximal to the injection site was compressed to prevent the proximal flow. In the first thigh, from the area just distal to the inguinal ligament, an epidural catheter was advanced distally beneath the fascia iliaca over the femoral nerve. In the remaining cases, 10 mL of blue dye was injected into the femoral nerve at the level of the proximal adductor canal and dye spread was evaluated after local dissection. The clinical study was conducted in 20 patients with severe varus deformities. Ten milliliters of 0.75% ropivacaine was injected as in the cadaveric series. The femoral nerve was successfully dyed in all cases of the cadaver study, whereas the muscular branch to the sartorius muscle and quadriceps muscle, with the exception of the vastus medialis muscle, evaded dyeing. All 20 patients with varus knee deformities reported analgesia; none of them experienced motor block. We conclude that local anesthetic injection at the site where the superficial femoral artery has passed beneath the medial border of the sartorius muscle (8 to 12 cm distal to the inguinal crease), combined with efforts taken to prevent proximal flow may anesthetize the sensation of the anterior-to medial aspect of the knee and motor branch of the vastus medialis muscle, without blocking the sartorius or quadriceps muscles.
 
We do adductor canal blocks regularly in order to get saphenous coverage supplementation to our popliteal blocks. We are doing them about mid thigh to the distal 1/3 area from ASIS to knee. Our experience has been that it isn't consistent enough to provide a surgical block, but that it works well for post-op pain. One of our Regional fellows is currently doing a study comparing adductor canal caths to fem caths for TKA's. Anecdotal reports so far are that they work so-so for TKA's. A few pts that had a fem cath for their first TKA and now got a adductor canal cath for their other TKA much preferred the fem cath. I personally have some concerns about how well a catheter will stay put in the adductor canal.

I do my adductor canal block in the middle of the sartorius muscle. I scan the thigh for the sartorius (looks like a whale) then find the middle of the muscle (belly of the whale). I find the artery under the belly of the whale/sartorius then inject the local; I can usually see the saphenous nerve near the artery. If I can't see the nerve then I inject anterior and posterior to the artery (6-10 mls in total).

The clinical question is how distal can the block be placed in the adductor canal in order to avoid proximal spread and/or avoiding the nerve to the vastus medialus. The study I posted above shows a proximal Adductor canbal block reliably blocks the nerve to the vastus medialus as well as the saphenous nerve. I suspect that no matter how distal I go in the adductor canal proximal spread can and will occur.
 
sartorius_muscle1.png
 
I love this block because it gets that saphenous distribution reliably without needing to traverse any muscle bodies in the thigh.
 
Two cases of ACL with cadaveric allograft, with adductor canal block. Both 0.5%bupiv

1. Intraop LMA, fent 25, toradol 30 for case. Postop, pt started having posterior knee pain and got 0.6mg dilaudid

2. Intraop LMA, fent 100mcg. Postop, Norco x1 with 2/10 pain only.
 
Two cases of ACL with cadaveric allograft, with adductor canal block. Both 0.5%bupiv

1. Intraop LMA, fent 25, toradol 30 for case. Postop, pt started having posterior knee pain and got 0.6mg dilaudid

2. Intraop LMA, fent 100mcg. Postop, Norco x1 with 2/10 pain only.

For your block then, Oggg, did you just use 10 mL of local? Or how much?
 
Just starting out, so 15-20cc 0.5% bup. I feel confident in lowering it to 10-15cc based on spread now.
 
10-15 mLs is enough if you're happy with the perineural spread you see on the US image.

I routinely place an adductor canal block for saphenous coverage in foot/ankle surgery as well as for ambulatory knee surgery (ACL). I have placed a good number of AC catheters for TKA as well and have found them to provide solid post op analgesia while minimizing quadriceps motor block.
 
Does anyone place AC catheters preop for TKA? It seems like they would be in the field, so you'd have to put them in PACU or in the OR after the dressings are on?, and do a spinal with or without duramorph for the surgery.
 
I have only done them preop. I would place the block/catheter in the AC just above mid-thigh and then use the touhy to tunnel the catheter proximally so that it's out of the surgical field.
 
Top