Advice for future DO applicants from a nobody

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

HaveAnOsteoblast

Full Member
5+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2018
Messages
335
Reaction score
304
Hey, guys. I've had an okay DO application cycle. Non-trad, GPA 3.7-3.8, MCAT: 505-509. Applied in Oct. Accepted to a couple of schools.

I've been reflecting on what I experienced during this cycle, and I've milked some advice out of my reflections. I thought I'd share this advice in case it'd help some future DO applicants who are as ignorant as I was when I started this process. (Obviously, I'm not Goro or somebody important. I'm just some guy, so don't take my advice as divine providence.)

This is what I would've sent my past self 6 months ago as sort of a warning of what's to come. Some of the advice might be common sense, and some of it might be contentious, but it is what is.

Here goes:

APPLICATIONS

Do research on what being a DO is about. You're looking to be an osteopathic physician for the rest of your life. Until the day you kick the bucket, you'll have the "DO" initials listed after your name. You might want to understand the history behind the osteopathic tradition. Personally, I recommend "The DOs," by Gevitz. The latest version is from the early 2000s so the info on the present day is outdated... but it includes a lot of good history that you should really know and care about.

Don't apply late.
It'll hurt you the most at the more competitive DO schools. My stats were better than the avgs at KCU, DMU, TUCOM-CA, etc., but as an October applicant, I mainly got love at newer, less established schools. At the more established schools, I either got silent rejections or late interviews when their classes were almost filled. (If you have no choice but to apply late, then apply late... because going to a new school is better than taking a gap year, usually. Otherwise, apply as early as you can.)

Apply as broadly as you can. Apply to every single school that you'd prefer attending over taking another gap year. For me, that meant applying to over 20 schools.

Be patient. I was the neurotic pre-med who assumed that silence meant a rejection. Silence sometimes meant a very delayed rejection, but it also sometimes meant a late interview interview. Worrying isn't gonna get you anywhere.

---

INTERVIEWS

Don't necessarily be yourself during interviews. The canned advice that everyone on here gets is "be yourself on interview day." For better or for worse, a lot of applicants are just applying to DO as a backup to MD, many don't really understand and/or care about OMM, osteopathic philosophy, etc., and some aren't terribly interested in primary care. If you're on one of these boats, you have to just play the game. Obviously, don't lie and say that you're A.T. Still reincarnate, but try to be open-minded and avoid talking points that don't align with the ideal DO mold.

Take stuff M1s and M2s say on interview day with a grain of salt. I met a lot of aspiring dermatologists, interventional radiologists, and orthopedic surgeons on my interview days. Please know that a majority of these students are facing a huge uphill battle (perhaps unbeknownst to them), and carefully read the DO matching data so that you're actually informed. Also, I rarely heard current medical students voice any actual criticisms of their schools during interview days. An applicant would ask "What do you like the least about your school?" and the medical student would give some throwaway answer about busy parking or limited food options in the dining hall. If you want to hear to real concerns about schools, reach out to current students through an anonymous medium such as SDN.

Don't be a jerk (and expect to encounter a few jerks). I know it's sort of hard to believe, but there were several very obnoxious characters from my interview days, ranging from a guy who asked a group of second-year students "Hey, what's the difference between OMM and chiropractic? I can't really tell the difference!" to another guy who knowingly left a half-eaten granola bar on a random table inside the admissions office. When you do stuff like that, you leave a horrible impression on people. Why would you want to behave like an asshat when the stakes are so high?

---

AFTER THE INTERVIEW
Don't worry too much about "thank you" letters. I suspect that they don't make a difference. The one school I sent "thank you" letters to gave me a post-II R. (I know, I know. N=1.) You can do it to be polite, but if you're doing MMI interviews, don't bother trying to find contact info for every single person you meet.

Don't waste time trying to evaluate your own interview performance. You'll think you bombed an interview, and you'll get an acceptance. You'll think you aced an interview, and you'll get a waitlist or rejection. Some of us lack confidence and some of us have too much confidence. We're poor judges of our own interview skills, and we aren't able to consider the other factors that the adcoms are taking into account post-II. Just roll with the punches.

Don't bother with LOIs, generally. Schools don't really seem to care about letters of intent, because they're common and not binding. (There are exceptions. One school I interviewed at explicitly encourages waitlisted applicants to regularly send LOIs.)

---

Sorry for any typos. It was sort of a stream-of-consciousness thing, and I didn't edit anything.

That's all I've got. Good luck, DO class of 2024.
 
Hey, guys. I've had an okay DO application cycle. Non-trad, GPA 3.7-3.8, MCAT: 505-509. Applied in Oct. Accepted to a couple of schools.

I've been reflecting on what I experienced during this cycle, and I've milked some advice out of my reflections. I thought I'd share this advice in case it'd help some future DO applicants who are as ignorant as I was when I started this process. (Obviously, I'm not Goro or somebody important. I'm just some guy, so don't take my advice as divine providence.)

This is what I would've sent my past self 6 months ago as sort of a warning of what's to come. Some of the advice might be common sense, and some of it might be contentious, but it is what is.

Here goes:

APPLICATIONS

Do research on what being a DO is about. You're looking to be an osteopathic physician for the rest of your life. Until the day you kick the bucket, you'll have the "DO" initials listed after your name. You might want to understand the history behind the osteopathic tradition. Personally, I recommend "The DOs," by Gevitz. The latest version is from the early 2000s so the info on the present day is outdated... but it includes a lot of good history that you should really know and care about.

Don't apply late.
It'll hurt you the most at the more competitive DO schools. My stats were better than the avgs at KCU, DMU, TUCOM-CA, etc., but as an October applicant, I mainly got love at newer, less established schools. At the more established schools, I either got silent rejections or late interviews when their classes were almost filled. (If you have no choice but to apply late, then apply late... because going to a new school is better than taking a gap year, usually. Otherwise, apply as early as you can.)

Apply as broadly as you can. Apply to every single school that you'd prefer attending over taking another gap year. For me, that meant applying to over 20 schools.

Be patient. I was the neurotic pre-med who assumed that silence meant a rejection. Silence sometimes meant a very delayed rejection, but it also sometimes meant a late interview interview. Worrying isn't gonna get you anywhere.

---

INTERVIEWS

Don't necessarily be yourself during interviews. The canned advice that everyone on here gets is "be yourself on interview day." For better or for worse, a lot of applicants are just applying to DO as a backup to MD, many don't really understand and/or care about OMM, osteopathic philosophy, etc., and some aren't terribly interested in primary care. If you're on one of these boats, you have to just play the game. Obviously, don't lie and say that you're A.T. Still reincarnate, but try to be open-minded and avoid talking points that don't align with the ideal DO mold.

Take stuff M1s and M2s say on interview day with a grain of salt. I met a lot of aspiring dermatologists, interventional radiologists, and orthopedic surgeons on my interview days. Please know that a majority of these students are facing a huge uphill battle (perhaps unbeknownst to them), and carefully read the DO matching data so that you're actually informed. Also, I rarely heard current medical students voice any actual criticisms of their schools during interview days. An applicant would ask "What do you like the least about your school?" and the medical student would give some throwaway answer about busy parking or limited food options in the dining hall. If you want to hear to real concerns about schools, reach out to current students through an anonymous medium such as SDN.

Don't be a jerk (and expect to encounter a few jerks). I know it's sort of hard to believe, but there were several very obnoxious characters from my interview days, ranging from a guy who asked a group of second-year students "Hey, what's the difference between OMM and chiropractic? I can't really tell the difference!" to another guy who knowingly left a half-eaten granola bar on a random table inside the admissions office. When you do stuff like that, you leave a horrible impression on people. Why would you want to behave like an asshat when the stakes are so high?

---

AFTER THE INTERVIEW
Don't worry too much about "thank you" letters. I suspect that they don't make a difference. The one school I sent "thank you" letters to gave me a post-II R. (I know, I know. N=1.) You can do it to be polite, but if you're doing MMI interviews, don't bother trying to find contact info for every single person you meet.

Don't waste time trying to evaluate your own interview performance. You'll think you bombed an interview, and you'll get an acceptance. You'll think you aced an interview, and you'll get a waitlist or rejection. Some of us lack confidence and some of us have too much confidence. We're poor judges of our own interview skills, and we aren't able to consider the other factors that the adcoms are taking into account post-II. Just roll with the punches.

Don't bother with LOIs, generally. Schools don't really seem to care about letters of intent, because they're common and not binding. (There are exceptions. One school I interviewed at explicitly encourages waitlisted applicants to regularly send LOIs.)

---

Sorry for any typos. It was sort of a stream-of-consciousness thing, and I didn't edit anything.

That's all I've got. Good luck, DO class of 2024.
A LOT of the sage advice here is applicable to applying MD school interviews as well! Good job, HAO!
 
I guess most people will disagree with me, but I believe I have had some success with LOI's and I believe if you can make a distinct argument on why you would be a great fit at that school (a question that is usually not asked in secondaries) it can add to your application and make you stand out. I believe someone who shows an adcom that they truly want to be there in a non generic BS way can stand to benefit from it. Again most will disagree but I thought LOI's I sent helped me get II and into schools way out of my stat range
 
I guess most people will disagree with me, but I believe I have had some success with LOI's and I believe if you can make a distinct argument on why you would be a great fit at that school (a question that is usually not asked in secondaries) it can add to your application and make you stand out. I believe someone who shows an adcom that they truly want to be there in a non generic BS way can stand to benefit from it. Again most will disagree but I thought LOI's I sent helped me get II and into schools way out of my stat range

The general rule of thumb is that LOIs are useless unless the school explicitly states otherwise.
 
I guess most people will disagree with me, but I believe I have had some success with LOI's and I believe if you can make a distinct argument on why you would be a great fit at that school (a question that is usually not asked in secondaries) it can add to your application and make you stand out. I believe someone who shows an adcom that they truly want to be there in a non generic BS way can stand to benefit from it. Again most will disagree but I thought LOI's I sent helped me get II and into schools way out of my stat range

I sent love letters to three schools. One didn’t respond, one responded by saying that they don’t accept or consider post-secondary updates, and one sent me a generic email about how my new submission has been added to my file. No IIs from any of them.

Idk, I’m going off my own experience and my recent realization that LOIs are common for desperate applicants and many aren’t genuine.

Also, I get where you’re coming from but idk if cooccurance = causation, ya know? Maybe you would’ve gotten IIs from those places regardless cuz you’re an all star
 
YMMV, but my best interviews were where I candidly was given the opportunity to say how my interest in D.O. wasn't anything regarding the hands or OMM. I even got to say how my physician I shadowed never used any osteopathic techniques. I think interviewers can smell that BS really well; important to know going into your interview day that these guys ain't dumb.

I said things along the lines of the community approach: my second major was Community Psych and even rural D.O. schools are usually campuses built around a community whereas rural M.D. schools are campuses with a community built around them. What OP said in their first point is true; I didn't have the stats for my state M.D. schools. But there are ways to express your interest in osteopathic schools that don't involve OMM or stroking A.T. still. Find them and make them personal
 
But there are ways to express your interest in osteopathic schools that don't involve OMM or stroking A.T. still. Find them and make them personal

+1 on this. You really don't have to "learned OMM techniques from current OMS and then practiced on my roommate to relief her back pain"
 
+1 on this. You really don't have to "learned OMM techniques from current OMS and then practiced on my roommate to relief her back pain"

(more a response in general, not necessarily to the quote)

In my opinion, there are parts of OMM that I think every physician should learn.

Conversely, there are parts that are goddamn voodoo magic and should’ve been lost in the sands of time.

Capitalize on the pieces we share with physical therapy programs and find something about it that you like. It’s not all garbage.
 
I agree with what osteoblast said. Being a DO or MD does not really matter as long as you want to be a doctor. It may be harder to get the residency you want as a DO, but if you score high on boards it should not be an issue it just depends on how driven you are. In my experience with this cycle and in talking to deans of admissions from both DO and MD schools, DO schools actually look at the application holistically (have lower minimum score requirements as well) whereas a majority of MD schools will not completely review your application if you fall below the minimum MCAT subsection scores (~127 per section) and gpa (varies per school ~3.5 minimum cgpa).

At the end of the day if you want to go into a certain specialty you have the same resources available to you at Top-ranked MD school or an average DO school, First aid, UWorld, pathoma etc. Med school rankings are based on politics and accepting students with high stats. Having 4 years of direct patient contact will not help you get into an MD school if you have a 500 MCAT, but most DO schools will actually look to see that you have had patient contact hours. No actual studies have been conducted about the caliber of physician that graduated from any school. Becoming a physician is a great accomplishment and getting into any DO or MD school is not easy, so definitely apply to both to give yourself the best chance at achieving your goal!
 
Update: I'll be starting at DMU in the fall. My cycle ended up working out all right, and I'm super grateful and excited for the chance to become a DOctor. That being said, I still stand by my original advice: I think I would've had much better luck at more schools if I had been able to apply sooner. Had I applied in June rather than October, I think some of the silent rejections I received from more established schools would've been II's. Schools become more picky about whom they interview as the cycle progresses.

Anyway, here's my final score card for the cycle:
27 primaries
25 secondaries (decided CCOM and AZCOM were just too expensive)
10 II's
5 IA's
Decisions: 2 A, 1 W -> A, 1 W -> withdraw, 1 R

If anybody has any questions about applying to DO schools, interviewing, writing essays, or juicy romantic drama, feel free to contact me either through a post in this thread or a PM. I'll probably be free for the next month or so.

Good luck with your application cycles, everybody.
 
Last edited:
Update: I'll be starting at DMU in the fall. My cycle ended up working out all right, and I'm super grateful and excited for the chance to become a DOctor. That being said, I still stand by my original advice: I think I would've had much better luck at more schools if I had been able to apply sooner. Had I applied in June rather than October, I think some of the silent rejections I received from more established schools would've been II's. Schools become more picky about whom they interview as the cycle progresses.

Anyway, here's my final score card for the cycle:
27 primaries
25 secondaries (decided CCOM and AZCOM were just too expensive)
10 II's
5 IA's
Decisions: 2 A, 1 W -> A, 1 W -> withdraw, 1 R

If anybody has any questions about applying to DO schools, interviewing, writing essays, or juicy romantic drama, feel free to contact me either through a post in this thread or a PM. I'll probably be free for the next month or so.

Good luck with your application cycles, everybody.

Congrats on the acceptance!!

Mind if I PM you a couple questions about your experience applying to osteopathic schools? I'm not sure if your settings prohibit me from PM'ing you or if I am having trouble with the interface of the site (i'm new to SDN haha).
 
Congrats on the acceptance!!

Mind if I PM you a couple questions about your experience applying to osteopathic schools? I'm not sure if your settings prohibit me from PM'ing you or if I am having trouble with the interface of the site (i'm new to SDN haha).

Oops, thanks for letting me know. I fixed my settings, so I should be able to receive PMs now.
 
Thanks for sharing your experience. Just bought kindle version The DOs and I have to say it sure is informative. During your interviews, were you ever asked about the history of dr. Still?
 
Don't waste time trying to evaluate your own interview performance. You'll think you bombed an interview, and you'll get an acceptance. You'll think you aced an interview, and you'll get a waitlist or rejection. Some of us lack confidence and some of us have too much confidence. We're poor judges of our own interview skills, and we aren't able to consider the other factors that the adcoms are taking into account post-II. Just roll with the punches.

Don't ruminate, but you have to learn. Double, if you are in re-applicant land.
 
Thanks for sharing your experience. Just bought kindle version The DOs and I have to say it sure is informative. During your interviews, were you ever asked about the history of dr. Still?

Never any historical questions. But you can bring up your appreciation for the history and traditions if they ask “why osteopathic medicine?”
 
Don't ruminate, but you have to learn. Double, if you are in re-applicant land.

In order to improve, you need external feedback. We will never be good judges of our own interview performance, because we suck at aligning our self-evaluations with the subjective assessments of others.

I recommend mock interviews (but not with people who are afraid to hurt your feelings).
 
Top