- Joined
- Dec 6, 2008
- Messages
- 1,031
- Reaction score
- 556
- Points
- 5,296
- Location
- Carrel 118
- Medical Student
General Problem
Hey everyone! For quite some time I have been wrestling with the issue of whether I need formal graduate training (M.S. or Ph.D.) to pursue the type of academic career I want. Although I have research experience, and realize that I will get much more during medical school and residency, I am interested in pursuing a field of research which I have little background in (computational biology/biomedical engineering). Do you think that I will need the protected didactic and research time provided by a graduate program to acquire the skills necessary to become an independent physician scientist?
Background
After graduating with degrees in both physical and biological sciences in May of 2013 I am taking a year to pursue fulltime research and apply to medical schools. Currently I have been accepted to several programs and am on waitlists/waiting to hear back from a few more. My research is in biophysics and the techniques which I use most in my laboratory are electrophysiology, fluorescence microscopy, and imaging. By the time medical schools starts I will have been in my current lab for just about four years and have a first author publication and presentations at national conferences. Hopefully my project will be to the point where I can get another first author publication by the time that I leave, but as we all know that is a great uncertainty 🙂!
Research Interests
My research interests lie in the fields of computational biology/biomedical engineering. Although I’m not exactly sure what topic I want to focus on, I am very interested in mathematical modeling, biomedical imaging and image analysis, and biomedical technology/devices. My current research has given me experience with imaging and image analysis and has exposed me to mathematical modeling. We also have a machine shop and I really enjoy dreaming up new experiments and going into the shop and fabricating the necessary experimental equipment.
However, my math skills and certainly my programming skills are on a very basic level. I have just taken the calculus sequence plus some linear algebra necessary for quantum mechanics; I have not taken any computer science courses. It has really been my experience teaching myself a programming language this year in my free time which has shown me how much more training and experience I really need to do the type of research that I want. For these reasons have been debating whether I need to get a graduate degree so that I can have formal training in some of these areas. At the same time, I know that it might be difficult to get into a dual degree program since I didn’t apply to one from the get-go. Further, I’m not 100% sure that I even need to go the dual degree route and don’t want to spend extra time in training if it’s not necessary.
So with all of this in mind, do you guys think that I need to pursue a formal dual degree program or should I just work on doing research in labs whose focus aligns with my own interests?
Hey everyone! For quite some time I have been wrestling with the issue of whether I need formal graduate training (M.S. or Ph.D.) to pursue the type of academic career I want. Although I have research experience, and realize that I will get much more during medical school and residency, I am interested in pursuing a field of research which I have little background in (computational biology/biomedical engineering). Do you think that I will need the protected didactic and research time provided by a graduate program to acquire the skills necessary to become an independent physician scientist?
Background
After graduating with degrees in both physical and biological sciences in May of 2013 I am taking a year to pursue fulltime research and apply to medical schools. Currently I have been accepted to several programs and am on waitlists/waiting to hear back from a few more. My research is in biophysics and the techniques which I use most in my laboratory are electrophysiology, fluorescence microscopy, and imaging. By the time medical schools starts I will have been in my current lab for just about four years and have a first author publication and presentations at national conferences. Hopefully my project will be to the point where I can get another first author publication by the time that I leave, but as we all know that is a great uncertainty 🙂!
Research Interests
My research interests lie in the fields of computational biology/biomedical engineering. Although I’m not exactly sure what topic I want to focus on, I am very interested in mathematical modeling, biomedical imaging and image analysis, and biomedical technology/devices. My current research has given me experience with imaging and image analysis and has exposed me to mathematical modeling. We also have a machine shop and I really enjoy dreaming up new experiments and going into the shop and fabricating the necessary experimental equipment.
However, my math skills and certainly my programming skills are on a very basic level. I have just taken the calculus sequence plus some linear algebra necessary for quantum mechanics; I have not taken any computer science courses. It has really been my experience teaching myself a programming language this year in my free time which has shown me how much more training and experience I really need to do the type of research that I want. For these reasons have been debating whether I need to get a graduate degree so that I can have formal training in some of these areas. At the same time, I know that it might be difficult to get into a dual degree program since I didn’t apply to one from the get-go. Further, I’m not 100% sure that I even need to go the dual degree route and don’t want to spend extra time in training if it’s not necessary.
So with all of this in mind, do you guys think that I need to pursue a formal dual degree program or should I just work on doing research in labs whose focus aligns with my own interests?
Last edited: