- Joined
- Feb 24, 2011
- Messages
- 118
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi all,
I know this is out here already, but I am looking for some updated answers about the following:
1. Letters of Rec: Many schools allow only 3 letters, and I am struggling with who I should have write them. My boss at my current paid 2 yr RA job in a lab is a definite (Ph.D in clinical, can speak to my research experience, etc). Then, I have three more people to choose from, and I don't know who to boot...
1. Social psych prof @ undergrad - took two classes with him, and worked for him. He knows me quite well and I know would write a solid letter for me. Can definitely speak to my writing/critical thinking abilities, my work-with-other capabilities, etc.
2. Abnormal psych prof @ undergrad - only took one class with (A+) and worked in his lab for a brief time, recommended me for my present job, knows me fairly well, already agreed to write letters, very nice and I'm sure would write a very solid letter.
3. Dean @ undergrad- this is the tricky one. He is a PhD in clinical, but the only capacity I know him in really is that he mentored me all of undergrad- never worked for him, never took a class with him. BUT, he is my biggest fan and his letters have always been and will be glowing. Feels I have enormous potential to get my PhD and succeed, etc...
Who do I choose? Cast your votes!!!
2. Contacting POIs @ PSYDS: I know the deal with PhDs- I'm a match, I like your research, are you taking students? etc etc. My only question there is how to proceed when the school specifically lists faculty who will be taking students (Suffolk, for example)? What is my "reason" for contacting them then other than the obvious hi I want to be on your radar?!
However, with some of the PsyDs (applying to Rutgers, etc.) I am less sure how to navigate this. I can't really ask them if they're taking students, since they don't work on the mentor model at all. There are some people who I know I would be dying to work with, but it seems pushy to just email with the hopes of speaking to them about their work!
So, what do you all think???

I know this is out here already, but I am looking for some updated answers about the following:
1. Letters of Rec: Many schools allow only 3 letters, and I am struggling with who I should have write them. My boss at my current paid 2 yr RA job in a lab is a definite (Ph.D in clinical, can speak to my research experience, etc). Then, I have three more people to choose from, and I don't know who to boot...
1. Social psych prof @ undergrad - took two classes with him, and worked for him. He knows me quite well and I know would write a solid letter for me. Can definitely speak to my writing/critical thinking abilities, my work-with-other capabilities, etc.
2. Abnormal psych prof @ undergrad - only took one class with (A+) and worked in his lab for a brief time, recommended me for my present job, knows me fairly well, already agreed to write letters, very nice and I'm sure would write a very solid letter.
3. Dean @ undergrad- this is the tricky one. He is a PhD in clinical, but the only capacity I know him in really is that he mentored me all of undergrad- never worked for him, never took a class with him. BUT, he is my biggest fan and his letters have always been and will be glowing. Feels I have enormous potential to get my PhD and succeed, etc...
Who do I choose? Cast your votes!!!
2. Contacting POIs @ PSYDS: I know the deal with PhDs- I'm a match, I like your research, are you taking students? etc etc. My only question there is how to proceed when the school specifically lists faculty who will be taking students (Suffolk, for example)? What is my "reason" for contacting them then other than the obvious hi I want to be on your radar?!
However, with some of the PsyDs (applying to Rutgers, etc.) I am less sure how to navigate this. I can't really ask them if they're taking students, since they don't work on the mentor model at all. There are some people who I know I would be dying to work with, but it seems pushy to just email with the hopes of speaking to them about their work!
So, what do you all think???

