- Joined
- Jan 9, 2014
- Messages
- 650
- Reaction score
- 637
- Points
- 5,226
- Pre-Medical


Nah, but some will have their doubts about you if you are an older person.Are there any specialties which heavily favor young/traditional students? I have heard it's difficult to match into surgery if you are an older non-trad.
Are there any specialties which heavily favor young/traditional students? I have heard it's difficult to match into surgery if you are an older non-trad.
Surg is only 1-2 years longer than pretty much all other specialties (excluding fellowships) save neurosurgery so I highly doubt it.
Agree. As a non-trad, length of training for residency and any subsequent fellowships is something that will be of higher priority when the time comes for me to choose a specialty.The real question is why an older person would want to go thru surgical training. The few "non-trads" I knew doing gen surg residencies were really miserable f-cking people.
Agree. As a non-trad, length of training for residency and any subsequent fellowships is something that will be of higher priority when the time comes for me to choose a specialty.
Its actually a fairly common question in GS, especially at programs with mandatory research time (so 7 years of residency +/- fellowship). However, unless the OP is over the age of 40 (the conventional age at which programs *might* balk) age is not going to be a significant factor in residency selection. Its not just the length of training but the hours; the belief being that older candidates have less stamina, more family responsibilities whether its true or not, the concern exists.Surg is only 1-2 years longer than pretty much all other specialties (excluding fellowships) save neurosurgery so I highly doubt it.
Its actually a fairly common question in GS, especially at programs with mandatory research time (so 7 years of residency +/- fellowship). However, unless the OP is over the age of 40 (the conventional age at which programs *might* balk) age is not going to be a significant factor in residency selection. Its not just the length of training but the hours; the belief being that older candidates have less stamina, more family responsibilities whether its true or not, the concern exists.
When I was asked about it (as I was a bit older than the traditional candidate) my response that I was physically fit and active, had never been a heavy sleeper and had a family history of being long lived and healthy was apparently satisfactory.
Its not; the latter question is asked as well (although most probably are aware that they shouldn't).Just being curious here.....how is that any more legal than asking a younger woman if she plans to have kids during a residency?
this...4yrs max
Surg is only 1-2 years longer than pretty much all other specialties (excluding fellowships) save neurosurgery so I highly doubt it.
Even at advanced age, surgeon's physical and spatial skills outpace those of non-surgical colleagues. Retirement for physical reasons tends to be related to pain (neck, back, feet etc) and slowing of skills.I was thinking more in terms of skill level. Your fine motor skills deteriorate with age...stands to reason that an older gen surg resident might be looking at a comparatively short career.