Always ask for more, interactions with insurance companies

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

heybrother

28232
10+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2011
Messages
3,463
Reaction score
8,031
There was a prior discussion on this forum concerning insurance negotiations. I would love to know how things are going for other people. These are my recent experiences.

1. Large national insurance company. Commercial insurance contracts paying sub-Medicare in office for everything and ~107% of Medicare for surgery in ASC, but 1/4th of starting reimbursement for 3rd procedure in all circumstances so the more you do the less you get. Very difficult to ultimately get in touch with a person. Major bummer - a huge local employer switched to this insurance from BCBS so cases that were previously a positive multiplier over Medicare and supported the office are now essentially negative/worthless. Got in contact with reimbursement rep. Was told most people on plan are in "self insured plans" so they won't negotiate with me to save money for these employers. Yeah, its the local employer above. I asked the employer for help. They said its out of their hands. Asked insurance company for contract but haven't received it. Am going to test the waters telling people I will not operate on them because of their insurance and see what happens. Had a bunch of people in a row who potentially need involved surgery ie. calcaneal osteotomies, TN fusions etc. Interestingly this insurance company maintains a tiny network associated with one of these plans and has no foot and ankle orthopedists. Literally got a patient the other day that ortho told they couldn't see anymore after a medial mal / talar dome repair. Person is still hurting.

2. Large government insurance plan that is supposed to be full Medicare, but is run by private contractors who try to cut rates. In a prior year, a "MAC" type company within it cut my rates and I could never figure out who to call to fight it. Ultimately got the rates restored without much difficulty after finally speaking to a rep. This time around I spent more than a year running in circles trying to figure out who to speak to. My rates had been cut by 20-25% without any interaction. They simply sent me a letter a year ago saying "you don't need to do anything... and then the last page cut rates". I finally got someone on the phone this week and they asked me if I'd take 95% of Medicare. They wanted to know what level of discount I was willing to take. "None". I told them I'd already stopped seeing their new patients and I wouldn't take a cut. I provided a long list of reasons why they needed to pay me 100% of Medicare including that none of the private orthos in my town would take the insurance. Ultimately they appear to have caved and agreed to 0% discount. They said they had to speak to their boss before offering me the rate I wanted. Still waiting on the addendum to arrive. In short - in the span of like maybe 1.5 years I've had to fight 2 separate times to prevent a problematic goverment payor from cutting rates with a wave of their finger.

3. Some small plan wrote to me claiming they had multiple patients scheduled to see me and would within reason pay me whatever I asked for. However, the contract they sent me had 120% already written in. I asked for more and they ghosted me. They literally had included all sorts of paperwork essentially saying they wanted to co-exist with physician offices and all sorts of rainbows and unicorns with charts showing increased physician reimbursement. I'm mostly of the opinion plans like this exist so TPAs can undercut BCBS/Cigna and sell insurance to small self insured companies.

4. Small(? - honestly not sure) plan through a CIN network I'm with. Sent me a contract requesting to pay me 120% of Medicare. I wrote back and asked that CPT codes be paid 180% of Medicare. The person wrote back offering me 150% of all codes ie. E&M / CPT / imaging - technically splitting the difference between their offer and mine. I wrote back and told them it would be signed tomorrow if it was 160%. They had to get authorization and ultimately it got signed for 160% of everything. I will fully concede that 160% is not actually hot reimbursement for actual surgery, but there are far more 99204+xrays coming in to discuss surgery than to actually commit to surgery. My IPA had provided me a diversity of contracts that were interesting - a straight 165%, a 135/150/175%, and a 135/150/185%. For something negotiated without them this felt in line with prior rates we'd been able to get through the group.

5. Large company in state. Horrible interactions with them in the past ie. asked for help with rates and got some E&M increases but massive CPT cuts. Contacted local rep asking for increase in rates again as it had been several years. Was sent to some website where I could request contract modifications. Sent off a polite request. Never heard back. Realized I never got a confirmation email so I wasn't even sure how long I'd already waited other than using the email from the first rep. Ultimately contacted them again. Finally heard back. They offered trivial increases to E&M, radiology - maybe 5%, if I recall a 15% increase to CPT, and a cut to DME. I wrote back asking for more and reversal of the DME cut. Ultimately they increased the CPT rate I think another 5% and undid the DME cut. However, I have since been contacted by a local rep who heard we weren't satisfied and I'm going to keep bugging them for more. If an aggrieved email gets you another $5 a patient/encounter then you should send them. Nothing in this contract exceeds 130% of Medicare but I think we increased one component of the contract by 20% - albeit underlying Medicare rates keep falling so we're in many ways just treading water.

6. Some new Medicare Advantage plan contacted us the other day asking if we were interested. I'm really not, but I'll write to them and ask for 120% just to see what happens. Costs nothing. They can ghost me, but I don't care. Make yourself available to Medicare Advantage plans undercuts real Medicare, sets you up for denials from fraud factory companies that shouldn't exist and creates the appearance these plans have real networks.

7. My partner wanted me to ask a plan we'd left what they'd pay if we rejoined. The rates are still crap ie. 90% of Medicare (which could maybe be negotiated up 5%), but much worse than that - the contract they offered us is now ENORMOUS. It used to be short and straight forward. Its got all sorts of "you shalls" that weren't in it previously. I would tell people to definitely read the hell out of contracts from large national Medicare Advantage plans. For example - this new contract wants the practice to have new malpractice group coverages that we don't have - we just have individual malpractice. It also wants us to create all sorts of quality committees within the practice - there are 2 of us. Last of all - we can't stop accepting new patients from them without contacting them and working to resolve our differences. What's the first thing you do when a plan starts defrauding you or not paying you - limit your liability by not accepting new patients. Not on this contract. They are now sending me emails every week to remind me to sign the contract.

-I have still never had an interaction with an insurance company where asking for help on a particular CPT code works. Everyone wants to do a percentage of Medicare.
-While I managed to resolve one above, E&M continues to be underpaid compared to CPT. My suspicion is this is because plans with copays usually have to cover the rest of the visit after the copay so a high E&M reimbursement rate transfers more financial liability to the insurance company.
-Tying reimbursement to Medicare is convenient for insurance companies but problematic for us because underlying Medicare rates continue to decline.
-Its not just a case of negotiating good rates with plans. You have to read the contract. You have to know the contact points for reps associated with your plans.
-People will tell you that you should ask for a rate increase every year, but many plans make it difficult to figure out who to ask.
-Large insurance companies continue to simply unilaterally decrease provider rates with contract addendums in which you have no feedback.
-Some of the above felt relatively decent. I'd had periods in the past with my office where I thought "I've stopped the bleeding", but my inability to resolve issues with a local common payor remains problematic to me.
-Always be planning your next email explaining why you need more. Their email offering you a bit more should always trigger a higher counter offer.
-My weird battle on asking for more though is that - sometimes I think the things we value are things they don't value. For example - you think - I'll make a case that I'm an amazing surgeon, that I set woundcare patients free from expensive hospital facility HBO tanks. I wonder do the insurance reps just hear "expensive facility surgery".

Podiatry for me at least remains a volume business.
 
Last edited:
I think medicine in general is going towards volume-based care, now the insurances and the government of course want to say it's value-based care. But it's the same concept. See more patients, perform less care and get paid less.

Over the years I have just become more passive aggressive with poor/difficult payors. On my peer to peer phone calls to appeal denials I didn't even waste my time with them. "Fine. I will just tell the patient you guys didn't want to cover it and he/she won't heal because of it. Thanks and bye." Somehow they always end up covering it the next day.

I have been wanting to drop a HMO plan but they make it rather hard for me to do that. Rate negotiation is not feasible. So in the meantime I just sent everybody to the hospitals. You want bunion surgery? Sure, whenever the main OR allows me to schedule it. Lesser toe osteo? Hmmm, could have done a partial/total amp in the procedure room, but nah you are going to the hospital to get admitted. This HMO also happens to have a very small network of accepting SNFs and home health agencies, so once they are in the hospital they are stuck there for weeks.

Tricare has been a growing issue for us. Nothing is covered for non active duty members. So I just sent them out. Well, they gotta try care.

Our plans through CIN actually pay decent. But I always start at 180-200% Medicare rates. I don't even recognize the names of these plans so if they won't budge then I don't really care.

I negotiate separate contracts with hospitals on diabetic pus stuff. I dropped a bunch of plans that these patients are typically on (usually Medicaid HMOs). I get reimbursed directly from the hospitals and once wounds healed I just sent them out to FQHCs.

I think in general patients are finding it harder for insurances to cover elective foot and ankle surgeries. Myself experienced more plans denying elective surgeries for the past 1-2 years. And our local foot and ankle orthos have been referring these cases out as well. Probably they figured it's not worth their time. I refuse the ones that want "3D bunion correction", but will take the soft tissue cases. Somehow nobody in my area wants to take out ganglion cysts. I like those, less risky than bone cases, quicker, faster turnover. I did so many that a dermatology group keeps sending me all types of lesions/masses from the knee down.
 
Getting same/similar experience to heybrother and msion.
Only in my first year at a pp.
One big name insurance wanted to pay me 85% of medicare.
The medicine guys in the same building looked at it and were like "wtf"

One of their big players came out with price changes that they had to sign- 6% decrease for all E&M codes across the board.
Only codes that went up a few % were surgical subspecialty procedures.

For them its also a volume game now.
They don't take medicare advantage plans or non-name marketplace ones that pay jack.
 
I think MDs have the luxury we don’t in a sense they can fill up their schedules with good payers easily - but in many states we can’t due to oversaturation. So better to take a poor payer than a no payer (aka no patient appointment slot)
 
BCBS and UHC reimburses me about 50% compared to medicare rates. Won't budge with negotiation, claims that my practice has the "most competitive reimbursement rates in the region". Would love to verify that with other pods in the area if the contract didn't forbid us from doing it.

Side question, do other specialties get the same reimbursements from billing the same codes? Or is there inherent bias against podiatrists getting paid less for the same codes?
 
BCBS and UHC reimburses me about 50% compared to medicare rates. Won't budge with negotiation, claims that my practice has the "most competitive reimbursement rates in the region". Would love to verify that with other pods in the area if the contract didn't forbid us from doing it.

Side question, do other specialties get the same reimbursements from billing the same codes? Or is there inherent bias against podiatrists getting paid less for the same codes?
UHC in my area was 85% of medicare
BCBS was higher, can't remember off top of my head
Not sure about reimbursement rates for same codes compared to the medicine guys- good question, will ask.
 
I think MDs have the luxury we don’t in a sense they can fill up their schedules with good payers easily - but in many states we can’t due to oversaturation. So better to take a poor payer than a no payer (aka no patient appointment slot)
What is this oversaturation you speak of?
 
I think MDs have the luxury we don’t in a sense they can fill up their schedules with good payers easily - but in many states we can’t due to oversaturation. So better to take a poor payer than a no payer (aka no patient appointment slot)
Or would limiting the insurances you accept decrease your wait times and inversely increase the good payors who want to be seen this week/next versus 2-4 months?
 
Or would limiting the insurances you accept decrease your wait times and inversely increase the good payors who want to be seen this week/next versus 2-4 months?
I've tried. All it does is create empty space on your schedule. Gotta scrounge up what you can. 🦞
 
Or would limiting the insurances you accept decrease your wait times and inversely increase the good payors who want to be seen this week/next versus 2-4 months?
It's dicey to do that (in podiatry). It can work if you have VERY strong office and refer base, but it's a risk play.
The minute you try to do that, strong competition could move in (or start a new office, etc), they will take some patients and refers (PCPs usually want something they can refer all their foot pts to - not just certain payers or certain pathologies), and you will struggling for a full schedule at all, as @Adam Smasher alluded to.

Heck, in many metro cities, podiatrists are so cutthroat they're leaving spots open and trying to see new patient calls same day (even for MCR/MCA average or below payers). They simply don't want to lose those to the pod down the street, particularly the ingrowns and DME and stuff that still pays fair.

...in MD/DO world, DDS world, etc, then you're right... cut or mitigate crap payers and there are enough good payers visits. Plastics or derm or even PCPs can go cash pay in the right areas or with the right practice type. That is what happens when you have demand.

But podiatry doesn't have appropriate doc/population rates. Rules of normal doc supply/demand don't apply to us.
We grad way more than GI, Ent, rheum, derm, endo, etc each year... we have practicing doc numbers and graduate about as many as ortho (all types combined), nearly as much as general surgeons, etc every year. We have more DPMs practicing than any MD specialty except generalists and the like (FP, IM, OB, Peds, ER, Rad, psych) which act as PCPs or treat nearly all patients and/or support surgery/rad/hospitals/etc. It's sad. Click here and then > Physician Data > U.S. Physicians by Specialty and look at 2022 or 2023 data (for reference, podiatry has about 20k in practice by now with ballooning class sizes)
 
Last edited:
Top