- Joined
- Mar 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 2
Hey everyone,
I am looking for some input into using these two great resources along with coursework. I have been using FC but do not like that the cards I learn initially and rate high get scheduled two weeks out. I end up spending 2x the amount of time relearning it. However, with anki I have a much higher retention rate and can crush ~150-200 cards in an hour. I guess I am already biased towards Anki but have found strengths in both. There is also the fear of overlooking high yield material or including too much low yield. Thoughts?
As of right now, I am going through organ systems and I have adopted the DrWillBe deck for path and have found it to be great after making some more additions. Although, I sometimes end up putting just as much time in adding my own stuff to the DrWillBe deck as I do to FC. I would like to review the stuff from my basic science courses but I am not finding time for that and the summer between M1 and M2 seems more realistic to review it.
With that said, am I better off making my own cards? If so, I already know the time commitment would be huge but the decks I make would most likely be open to anyone to have once I polish them. I am looking into it being a great resource for others to use alongside the DrWillBe decks. The incentive is that M1s get a great resource to study with while leaving specific tags for HY topics they can migrate into a long term deck.
Here are some thoughts on each resource IMO:
Anki Pros
Highly portable
Highly customizable
Image Occlusion
Flash cards w/ sound
Easy to share with others
Able to tweak SR algorithm
Anki Cons
Time consuming to make cards
High learning curve
Firecracker Pros
Premade flashcards
Closely mirrors FA
Gives a calender to view cards
Easily flag/unflag topics
Many answers are given in context
Firecracker Cons
Many questions are poorly written
Many answers are lengthy and consume too much glucose
Poor search features
Their images suck
I am looking for some input into using these two great resources along with coursework. I have been using FC but do not like that the cards I learn initially and rate high get scheduled two weeks out. I end up spending 2x the amount of time relearning it. However, with anki I have a much higher retention rate and can crush ~150-200 cards in an hour. I guess I am already biased towards Anki but have found strengths in both. There is also the fear of overlooking high yield material or including too much low yield. Thoughts?
As of right now, I am going through organ systems and I have adopted the DrWillBe deck for path and have found it to be great after making some more additions. Although, I sometimes end up putting just as much time in adding my own stuff to the DrWillBe deck as I do to FC. I would like to review the stuff from my basic science courses but I am not finding time for that and the summer between M1 and M2 seems more realistic to review it.
With that said, am I better off making my own cards? If so, I already know the time commitment would be huge but the decks I make would most likely be open to anyone to have once I polish them. I am looking into it being a great resource for others to use alongside the DrWillBe decks. The incentive is that M1s get a great resource to study with while leaving specific tags for HY topics they can migrate into a long term deck.
Here are some thoughts on each resource IMO:
Anki Pros
Highly portable
Highly customizable
Image Occlusion
Flash cards w/ sound
Easy to share with others
Able to tweak SR algorithm
Anki Cons
Time consuming to make cards
High learning curve
Firecracker Pros
Premade flashcards
Closely mirrors FA
Gives a calender to view cards
Easily flag/unflag topics
Many answers are given in context
Firecracker Cons
Many questions are poorly written
Many answers are lengthy and consume too much glucose
Poor search features
Their images suck