I'm taking research courses under the "pharmacology" department, but the research is actually in neuroscience (neuroimaging). It's only under pharmacology because it's associated with the hospital.
From what I know, the content of the course is much more important than the title of the course. In which case, yes this would be a BCPM course.
edit: hopefully someone else answers too, but wouldn't pharmacology be BCPM anyways? At my school pharmacology classes were taken in the biology department.
I'm taking research courses under the "pharmacology" department, but the research is actually in neuroscience (neuroimaging). It's only under pharmacology because it's associated with the hospital.
I'm taking research courses under the "pharmacology" department, but the research is actually in neuroscience (neuroimaging). It's only under pharmacology because it's associated with the hospital.
You are supposed to classify courses based on their primary content.
If I were you, I would put it down as Biology. AMCAS might switch it however if the class title is something generic like "Research topics in Pharmacology" or something because there's nothing in the course department or title to indicate that it is neuroscience. I have read reports on SDN of users who were unable to convince AMCAS that their research course should count because of a similar situation. Hopefully they'll believe you
edit: hopefully someone else answers too, but wouldn't pharmacology be BCPM anyways? At my school pharmacology classes were taken in the biology department.
After your application is verified, you can submit an Academic Change Request to AMCAS to explain why they should change the course classification if you disagree with changes made during verification.