I have seen ET tubes come into the ER placed in the esophagus. If it anecdotal hour at SDN, I am sure we have all sorts of stories relating to these devices. However, the bottom line being, we have allot of evidence based literature stating that intubation does not make a difference in cardiac arrest. In some cases, such as the study this thread is based upon, intubation may be harmful. Therefore, it is acceptable to consider alternatives to intubation.
Additionally, I do not consider transitioning to a supraglottic device or simply sticking with mask ventilation lazy. (In spite of my comments made in jest.) I simply do not see the benefit of intubating these patients. In addition, one of the most objective measure I have available for placement verification (capnography and capnometry) is not always accurate in low perfusion states. I am simply not willing to take such a risk when evidence supports a more conservative methodology as being just as effective.
The ER replacing a supraglottic airway with an ET tube is a price of tea in China argument IMHO. I am also not keen on replacing functional supraglottic airways in the field. The old saying the enemy of good is better applies in some cases, and I am willing to be much more conservative if the conservative modalities are working. Additionally, I am not a paramedic and have no patch to turn in.