- Joined
- Sep 15, 2006
- Messages
- 248
- Reaction score
- 1
Inside Higher Education has reported on this year's Match.
Matchmaker, Matchmaker, is there really no Match?
Matchmaker, Matchmaker, is there really no Match?
There is a need for MH, but that doesn't mean it can effectively be met, but the current system is not equipped to address that need. If we wait in the APA, we may all die of old age. There needs to be a concerted effort to address the issues in the field.This is frightening for me since I just spent the last 5 years of my life preparing for a doctoral program and just recently was accepted. I am curious whether or not there will be a change in the situation by the time I am going through this process. I am fairly confident APA's answer would be do as much research and clinical work as you can get in your doc program and then cross your fingers; however, it doesn't seem like they are at all interested in creating a system that is more efficient and less stressful for applicants. I understand that there is an increasing need for mental health services in the country but so far the system has done a poor job of creating those job opportunities for early career psychologists. I am still going to pursue my PhD next fall but I do have some concerns as I have a growing family that is going to be in need of my income (I did get a really good deal on an assistantship though, so I shouldn't have anymore extra debt).
That was an excellent article. Unfortunately whenever the APA is involved/not as involved as they should be, they tend to move at a glacial pace, often not in the best interest of professionals. There is a reason why their membership %'s are low, and there has been a big push for associations like the NAPPP.