Any news on the FMG bills that spread like wildfire?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
You already answered this question yourself for FL in one of the other threads on this topic yesterday. For TN, as noted in a response to a similar question posted by you in yet another thread on this topic in February, the bill didn’t take effect until July so there’s no way anyone would know if there was an “effect” on US physicians yet.
 
There’s not a doctor I’ve talked to in my state that thinks the sky is falling. Relax bud
 
1720719128514.gif
 
Yes they’re still spreading. Already in the works or passed in about 12 states and likely in all 50 within the next few years since they always pass almost unanimously.

Nobody really knows how it will pan out in practice or how strict state medical boards will be in determining what “substantially similar residency” means. You can probably reach out and request that they set up strict requirements out of concern for public safety.


 
Last edited:
Considering the success rate of the H-1B lottery is down to about 1 in 4, I'm curious to see how many employers will find this worth their time.

The TN law stipulates that the employer must be operating at least one ACGME-approved training program. Right now there are 9 potential employers with continuing accreditation and 3 with initial accreditation.
 
Considering the success rate of the H-1B lottery is down to about 1 in 4, I'm curious to see how many employers will find this worth their time.

The TN law stipulates that the employer must be operating at least one ACGME-approved training program. Right now there are 9 potential employers with continuing accreditation and 3 with initial accreditation.

I agree, I think the impact will be fairly limited.

As you point out, many of the laws require the employer operate an ACME-approved program. Some require a few years of supervision (sounds almost like a residency...). For states where this isn't a requirement, the hospital is going to have zero idea about whether or not the medical school/residency program the applicant graduated from is decent, and more likely to say the effort isn't worth the risk of a bad physician (bad docs can be very hard to remove for medical staff. Really bad docs aren't). As a member of our hospital's medical executive committee, there's no way I would approve a foreign-trained physician without any US training/experience unless another member of the committee of a very trusted/respected staff physician could personally vouch for their skill/competence/ability to communicate/work with the US system.

Realistically we should be more worried about midlevels and AI. Which I don't think we need to be as worried about as people are on SDN--we're in such short supply and patients almost always prefer us when they have a choice (which they unfortunately often don't). The NP industry seems to think just throwing more NPs out into the wild is the answer rather than focusing on quality. They need a Flexnor Report moment or trust/respect of NPs will likely start taking in the next 10-20 years. PA's unfortunately are becoming less relevant because while they serve their role as a physician extender much better, in my opinion, employers want to hire NPs because they're more flexible due to their far more aggressive lobbying.

MD/DO's also need to work on admitting/training more physicians. We're part of the problem. My wife's PCP's office called my wife to cancel her appointment because the doc was going to be on vacation. This is for an annual exam appointment scheduled 6 months prior. And the next available appointment they could offer her despite it being their error, was in another 6 months. 6 months! To say we're short PCPs here is an understatment.

The sky is still here. But AI will likely change our workflow in the next 10-15 years. Maybe longer. Think about how long it took for the digital revolution to finally result in near-universal EMR access.
 
There is no cap on H1-B visas for academic institutions, so the big hospitals that are going to use these new laws to funnel in FMGs dont have to worry about visa limitations.
 
There is no cap on H1-B visas for academic institutions, so the big hospitals that are going to use these new laws to funnel in FMGs dont have to worry about visa limitations.
Basically copying and pasting an old post:

The USCIS is the poster boy of government bureaucracy and inefficiency. They don't just rubber stamp GCs and visas just because there's a need and no cap, it's a massive headache for the applicant and the sponsor. Coming from an immigrant family and knowing plenty of immigrants, it's an arduous, costly, often years-long process to file the paperwork and get it approved. And that's assuming all the paperwork is filled out and filed perfectly without the need for addendums. Not to mention the USCIS has been overwhelmed for years now, leading to backlogs, delays, and increased filing fees. Doesn't look like they'll get more manpower anytime soon.

Even without a visa cap non-profits have to file extra paperwork ensuring that no American wants the job and that wages aren't being depressed. That won't exactly be a quick process, and what do they have to gain? They probably have access to cheap resident labor.
 
Top