I do not have any personal experience with the program. But if you compare it to many of the other pre-professional enrichment certificate/masters programs, I think it falls short.
1. What's with the Masters of ART? I'm not sure what to make of it, but I don't think it's a good thing
Sometimes the Master of Arts vs. Master of Science is merely a matter of semantics, but sometimes it isn't. For example, I believe many of the masters programs through Boston University and the University at Buffalo (SUNY) are all Master of Arts. However, many of these programs include strong research components such as a laboratory thesis and/or thesis defense. Some schools offer the Master of Arts for non-thesis tracks and Master of Science for thesis tracks. An example is the Biology and Physiology masters programs offered at Ball State University in Indiana.
In the case of Loyola's program, I think the Master of Arts, as opposed to Master of Science, does make a difference. The MAMS program has no labs, no research papers/proposals, no library- or laboratory-based thesis, and no other research components (e.g., laboratory rotations). In contrast, a program like the Master of Arts in Medical Sciences at Boston University does require a library- or laboratory-based thesis.
2. What does everyone think of the program as a whole? (getting applicants into med school, administration, classes, student life, pros/cons, etc.)
From an observer's standpoint, I don't have a positive perception of the program.
Here's a comparison of some of characteristics of the better known Special Masters Programs:
Credit hours:
*Loyola 24
*UMDNJ 30
*Boston University 32
*EVMS 34
*Georgetown 34
*Rosalind Franklin 48
Classes with US MD students:
*Loyola-No
*Georgetown-Yes
*Boston University-Yes
*EVMS-Yes
*UMDNJ-Yes
*Rosalind Franklin-Yes
Research component (library/laboratory/clinical thesis, research paper, review, laboratory rotation, etc.)
*Loyola-No
*Rosalind Franklin- No
*Georgetown-Yes
*Boston University-Yes
*EVMS-Yes
*UMDNJ-Yes
The program just finished its first year. I think the acceptance rate that a student in the program gave me was like 40% and I'm not sure whether that included US MD, US MD and US DO, or US MD / US DO / foreign MD. This is significantly lower than other programs like Rosalind Franklin, Georgetown, Boston University, etc. Furthermore, students who had pretty good stats to start with may have even been accepted to med school in the Fall (mid-October through mid-December). In these cases, I think it's safe to say that the MAMS program probably didn't make the difference since grades would not have been released at that time.
3. How strong is the link to the med school? How many students apply to Loyola?
My understanding is that Stritch School of Medicine wants little to do with the program (at least relative to G-town, BU, Rosalind Franklin, EVMS, UMDNJ, etc.). The program is also designed to include a glide/lag year (see the description on the website).
4. Are these all grad school courses, or is it a mix? How hard are the classes?
All courses are graduate courses taken solely with your fellow MAMS students. You take no classes with MD, DO, PhD, MS, etc., students.
5. Any other useful info would be grrrrrreat.
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=176696
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=194156
It's no secret that I think the program is poorly designed. It's not completely useless, but I do think there are many other programs that are better designed or more established. I'd be happy to hear differing points of view on the program, but I don't think this program can compete with what many of the other pre-professional graduate-level programs have to offer.