Anyone NOT use FA Systems Based?

[kate0834tkjn]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Hi everyone...I have about 2 weeks left til my test, and have been over most everything once using various books and annotating FA. However, I didn't annotate phys (used brs) or path (used goljan RR and lectures), nor did I read the FA sections on path/phys. I feel like going back over RR/brs these last few weeks rather than reading FA path/phys....what did others do? I feel lilke if it's in FA, it's probably in brs/RR and then some, but feel nervous about not using FA, given the rave reviews it gets on here. I plan on reviewing the first half of the book as well as the pharm.....what do people think?

 

[SOUNDMAN]

I'm using FA subject based because that's how my classes are taught. I do have the systems based edition (2006) as well though.

 

[AlbertConstable]

Skim through the FA sections and note/highlight/whatever the things that aren't in BRS Path or Phys. Most things are covered in more depth in the BRS books but a couple of items aren't (or are better organized in the FA sections) so it is worth briefly looking through.