- Joined
- May 22, 2018
- Messages
- 612
- Reaction score
- 273
In case anybody has never gone through an onsite interview for a job at a major company, if you make it to this step, you already made it past a very big cut. At that point, they pretty much end up offering a position to every candidate that they like. Do dental school interviews generally work this way too?
I know the major difference is that when interviewing for jobs, the company reimburses you for your reasonable travel expenses (e.g., flight, hotel, meals, ground transportation), whereas for dental school, the travel is at your own expense. It can cost the company over $1000 to bring in a candidate, and that cost can justify not wasting their resources on candidates they would not accept given the information they already have. Therefore, you pretty much get the offer if you don't screw up. Sure, they may still want to go over some things seen on your resume with you just to make sure you are who you appear to be on paper, but at that step, your GPA and qualifications are no longer being compared with that of other candidates. They will say that those who interview with you are your peers rather than your competition.
On the other hand, dental schools do not have to pay out all those travel costs for candidates invited to interview. However, I would like to hope that they don't want to waste your time, nor the interviewers' time. By extending an interview invitation, can you expect that the concept is still generally the same? That is, they want to verify that you are who you appear to be on your application, but your GPA, DAT, and other qualifications are no longer being compared with that of other candidates? Thus, if you do not get an acceptance after your interview, the issue is your interview?
I know the major difference is that when interviewing for jobs, the company reimburses you for your reasonable travel expenses (e.g., flight, hotel, meals, ground transportation), whereas for dental school, the travel is at your own expense. It can cost the company over $1000 to bring in a candidate, and that cost can justify not wasting their resources on candidates they would not accept given the information they already have. Therefore, you pretty much get the offer if you don't screw up. Sure, they may still want to go over some things seen on your resume with you just to make sure you are who you appear to be on paper, but at that step, your GPA and qualifications are no longer being compared with that of other candidates. They will say that those who interview with you are your peers rather than your competition.
On the other hand, dental schools do not have to pay out all those travel costs for candidates invited to interview. However, I would like to hope that they don't want to waste your time, nor the interviewers' time. By extending an interview invitation, can you expect that the concept is still generally the same? That is, they want to verify that you are who you appear to be on your application, but your GPA, DAT, and other qualifications are no longer being compared with that of other candidates? Thus, if you do not get an acceptance after your interview, the issue is your interview?