- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 234
- Reaction score
- 1
http://www.jaad.org/article/S0190-9622(09)01444-3/abstract
My favorite questionnaire question:
Question asked to the applicants and current residents: Did any dermatology program try to influence you by promising you incentives for ranking their program highly? (eg, future faculty position, special rotations)
Applicants - 5% yes, Residents - 3% yes
Program directors - 100% NO
Lovely article! Nothing was a surprise -- everybody knows that PD's across all specialties violate NRMP policy during their communication with applicants, but it was cool to see it bared to the public in a well-designed study. Hopefully Stanford knows how to keep their data hidden and truly anonymous - they obtained all the emails from ERAS (applicants), ABD (residents), and APD (program directors). I'd almost consider it borderline phishing.
My favorite questionnaire question:
Question asked to the applicants and current residents: Did any dermatology program try to influence you by promising you incentives for ranking their program highly? (eg, future faculty position, special rotations)
Applicants - 5% yes, Residents - 3% yes
Program directors - 100% NO
Lovely article! Nothing was a surprise -- everybody knows that PD's across all specialties violate NRMP policy during their communication with applicants, but it was cool to see it bared to the public in a well-designed study. Hopefully Stanford knows how to keep their data hidden and truly anonymous - they obtained all the emails from ERAS (applicants), ABD (residents), and APD (program directors). I'd almost consider it borderline phishing.