TiredChild
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2025
- Messages
- 6
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey everyone, I’m sitting on a difficult decision for a cycle that’s been kinda okay. Not very objective and I’m first gen, so I could use some help and I figured you all would be able to give me some solid advice.
Baylor Temple
Pros:
Pros:
UChicago (Pritzker)
Pros:
I think Baylor would've been the clear winner had it not been for Temple, and now I'm reconsidering. To anyone who responds or has advice, thank you, it's much appreciated. Super lost and too emotional and tired to process these days.
Baylor Temple
Pros:
- P/F pre-clinic and clinical (no internal ranking, someone correct if I’m wrong), heard it makes life a lot easier and less stressful
- Baylor name (pretty prestigious, it’s a roughly T20 school)
- Cheaper than the alternatives, from what I know, as a Texas resident, and that is a big plus
- Seems like the logical best of my options
- Solid historical matches for my current preferences specialties (i.e. Radiology, maybe ortho, ophtho, etc.)
- Probably would be my first choice...if not for Temple (see below)
- Wasn’t my first choice (or second) in Texas
- The Big One: Temple -
- 1) Not my first choice at all. I’ll probably be resentful of the fact that I was bottom of the barrel on Baylor's match list and got sent to this campus (against my hopes) until I’m too burnt out and tired to care anymore. Logically, I know it’s not personal, might even be a good thing (pure cope here), but I’ve spent the last several days feeling very down and wondering what was wrong with me to not get matched to Houston. The lack of transparency doesn't help here either.
- 2) Not sure how well the Temple campus will match compared to Houston, similar to Mayo AZ situation. We have no data and are essentially guinea pigs, and that worries me. No point in the Baylor prestige if Temple’s matches aren’t as good, and that would seriously frustrate me.
- Lack of consistent access to the TMC - the one good thing about Baylor in the first place
- Lack of access and networking (for research and in general) at Temple
- P/F clinicals are a double-edged sword, but from what I’ve heard, you can honor elective rotations so that should be fine. Just a small thing.
Pros:
- Fully P/F, no internal ranking
- Most chill and supportive from what I’ve heard and experienced
- I like the area
- Solid match list
- Far from home, don’t know anyone (not a big one, I've done it before, but it’s nice to have support)
- More expensive than Baylor
- Slightly less prestigious that Baylor or UChicago (T30 vs. T20)
UChicago (Pritzker)
Pros:
- The best ranked of the bunch (not saying much though, they’re all similar)
- I love Chicago as a city
- Heard great things about the program, very community oriented (a huge plus of mine)
- Solid match list
- Far from home
- No aid yet and by and away the most expensive, it’s insane
- Heard sketchy things about the area
- No P/F clinicals, which is double-edged sword again
- This is stupid, but the vibes compared to UVA or Baylor just weren't as great for me but again, that's a dumb consideration
I think Baylor would've been the clear winner had it not been for Temple, and now I'm reconsidering. To anyone who responds or has advice, thank you, it's much appreciated. Super lost and too emotional and tired to process these days.
Last edited: