- Joined
- Oct 24, 2024
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 66
- Points
- 31
- Attending Physician
Need to biopsy that BCC
blood glucose 205 on your VTAch hospice patient, please advise
Need to biopsy that BCC
I think some of the copers here feel helpful or needed with inane pages like this, probably because he has very little life purpose. Otherwise, and that’s why they don’t mindblood glucose 205 on your VTAch hospice patient, please advise
I mean, stuff like that does happen sometimes. Its been a pretty quiet year so far though. Also a) its more rare than you're making it sound and b) I can deal with it in a way that causes me little/no stress.“ I have experienced essentially none of that so far this year”
Admits to experiencing essentially all of this year
That’s great that you all don’t care about annoying messages, annoying patients, annoying families ultimately the therapeutic alliance has been destroyed by adversarial patient/families and I don’t know why everybody is so adamant to deny that
The biggest determining factor to whether this is a rare sighting versus an invasive species in your inbox is practice location.I mean, stuff like that does happen sometimes. Its been a pretty quiet year so far though. Also a) its more rare than you're making it sound and b) I can deal with it in a way that causes me little/no stress.
Here's the thing, unless you find it boring then outpatient medicine doesn't have to be nearly as bad as its made out to be. I enjoy my job. Do all of my notes/inbox stuff between patients or over lunch if I've gotten behind (due to meetings or whatnot).
I have very few adversarial patient/family encounters. Unless there's a solid reason (just got diagnosed with cancer and not handling it well, for example), I can dismiss them from my practice. Most of my patients like me, trust me, and don't cause any trouble.
He's probably just venting and knows he has no other options.No he never has and he never will because he trollin
![]()
I think I learned a version of this from @Apollyon many moons ago:It's a genuine mystery how you've encountered nothing but annoying people. A baffling statistical anomaly, with no discernible common factor in any of those interactions (heh heh)
Spoken by someone who has never been to FranceI think I learned a version of this from @Apollyon many moons ago:
When you go through your day and you meet an a***ole, you've met an a***ole. When you go through your day and everyone you meet is an a***ole, you're the a***ole.
Oh yeah, I get those now in a small-ish Southern town. But that's why I have a button that sends that message to my nurse with "Needs appt" written in and nothing else.The biggest determining factor to whether this is a rare sighting versus an invasive species in your inbox is practice location.
When I was in a big city, 95% of the Mychart messages were nonsensical, attention-seeking drivel. But now, in a semi-rural area, it's essentially non-existent. If anything big is happening regarding patient care, my staff would notify me and I would address it then and there.
I would think this phenomenon is worse in rheumatology, but also quite applicable to primary care.
This is my approach as well. I usually have a couple of open slots each week for urgent visits, but these people don't get them. My schedulers know to offer these people "next available, LOL" which is typically 2 weeks out.Oh yeah, I get those now in a small-ish Southern town. But that's why I have a button that sends that message to my nurse with "Needs appt" written in and nothing else.
Plus I'm booked out a week or more at any given point which often gives the crazy time to either settle down or go to urgent care.
As promised:The biggest determining factor to whether this is a rare sighting versus an invasive species in your inbox is practice location.
When I was in a big city, 95% of the Mychart messages were nonsensical, attention-seeking drivel. But now, in a semi-rural area, it's essentially non-existent. If anything big is happening regarding patient care, my staff would notify me and I would address it then and there.
I would think this phenomenon is worse in rheumatology, but also quite applicable to primary care.
Why don't you go to the Emergency Medicine forum here and post this and see what kind of responses you get.is there any clinical field that has less longitudinal training than emergency medicine? These guys have absolutely no clue or experience about what happens to the floor admissions. It’s bad enough that they spend 30 seconds to two minutes with the patient in most cases. Internal medicine and family medicine rotate in the ER to at least get a superficial understanding of the pressures ER docs face and why they might do certain things a certain way.
But these guys should also be required to do a month of floors, considering the vast majority of their admissions are to the floors. They have absolutely no clue why we care about certain things and still insist on forcing admissions and circumventing our concerns. At least now I understand why they spam orders based off of a triage cc after my brief rotation with them. They could be a little more well rounded by seeing what actually happens to the soft admissions they push through 15 min before their shift ends. But their field is really good about cushioning themselves in comfort and protecting from scutt so it’ll never happen even though it would actually be in the best interest.
All of us are very chill. You are the one uptight about how awful being a hospitalist is. Without addressing your points? How about you addressing what your plans are since you no longer plan on being a hospitalist? You are so evasive answering that it is pretty clear you are not quitting.I don’t need to, it’ll just be replies full of logical fallacy, maybe ad hominem, “ who hurt you?”, “ which ER doc broke up your marriage?” , unbothered, chill guys suggesting going hiking, without actually addressing the points I’m making.
?there are dozens of people in this thread, who agree with me
Although I can commiserate with your other complaints (although I don't find the severity of them anywhere near as problematic as you), this I don't understand. DOAC's are so much better than warfarin - less bleeding, easier to manage, etc. Discharging patients on warfarin is a nightmare. Are you suggesting that anticoagulating AF isn't worth it? Because that data is rather solid: Number needed to treat for net effect of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: Real-world vs. clinical-trial evidence - PubMed This is just one study, but a 4% ARR per year is nothing to sneeze at. NNT is 25, rises to 32 including harms -- which we should do, but personally if I had the choice between a bleed and a stroke, I'd take the bleed (if it's anywhere but intracranial, can be fixed).i hate eliquis so much. i think its probably responsible for 90% of medicare hospitalization costs. for what exarctly? some tiny net negative stroke risk reduction that probably came from a ivory tower cardiology study that had the data sliced to make p value skim below the .05 cutoff probably
Most do, it's part of their residency.(ED residents) ...should also be required to do a month of floors, considering the vast majority of their admissions are to the floors.