diabeticfootdr,
I thank you for your "graciousness" and apparent respect. The article you cited basically supports what I stated in my post. And that's the fact that the reason there is a trend to have to actually remunerate docs for ER call is because of low or no reimbursement, compounded by increased liability.
As I had also stated in my post, I don't know if I ever actually received payment for any patient I ever treated in the ER. Sure, it was a great teaching tool for the residents, since our service received the gunshot wounds instead of orthopedics, but at the same time I worked for 0 dollars.
And once again, not so long ago, obtaining ER on call "privileges" was just that.....a "privilege" that had to be earned by actually having X number of admissions or surgical cases.
I'm also not sure of the policy of hospitals in the midwest, but in the East, although I'm generating income for the hospital every time I perform a surgery or admit a patient, I still have to pay staff dues annually and every 2 years when I have to fill out new paper work for "re-appointment" I have to pay another fee. Those fees vary, but are usually between $350-500 per hospital.
So, it does add up and I'm not sure our younger forum members realize that many hospitals actually have staff fees, application fees, etc., to maintain staff "privileges" at their hospitals.
NatCH,
Just as a quick update on this "old timer" (I'm not nearly as old as you think), although we do have a few offices in the "big city", we also have MANY suburban practices, and I have also been heavily involved with "academics", as a surgical residency director and as an examiner for the ABPS certification examination. So I do come to the table with a relatively broad spectrum of experience, even though I'm "office based".
Though I do envy your part time status and status as a "kept man"
