Best Histopath Source?

[Gunneria]

---

Members don't see this ad.

Webpath, Goljan, or Wheater's? Webpath seems nice because you can just roll your mouse over something and read it easily on the screen, but I'm open to suggestions

 

[VisionaryTics]

1. It's your M1 summer. Go relax.
2. You create like 800000000 threads asking about the best resources for X, Y, or Z when this stuff has been rehashed ad nauseum. Use the damn search.

To answer your question, yes (by which I mean all of them). Use multiple sources to flesh out your knowledge.

 

[Captain Fantastic]

The one "best" source? I'd say probably Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. It's big and expensive, but very, very good. Someone could argue for Sternberg and I wouldn't fault them. It's like Harrison's or Cecil for Internal Medicine: not that different, but people usually have a favorite.

Now if you just want to cover the basics as needed for Step I, Rosai is way overkill but that wasn't the question.

 

[tco]

The one "best" source? I'd say probably Rosai and Ackerman's Surgical Pathology. It's big and expensive, but very, very good. Someone could argue for Sternberg and I wouldn't fault them. It's like Harrison's or Cecil for Internal Medicine: not that different, but people usually have a favorite.

Now if you just want to cover the basics as needed for Step I, Rosai is way overkill but that wasn't the question.

Rosai is terrible. His writing style is like this, "____ usually presents with ____, but 3 cases have been described with ____, ___, and ____; while one case (in the history of Earth) has presented with ____, ____, and ___." Go with Sternberg.

Good luck in second year!