Best surgical pathology book

[ravisingh007]

Out of rosai and sternberg which is better.i felt that sternberg I properly organised in heading and provides better microscopy compared to rosai considering the fact it is a multi authored book .rosai has more rare cases and studies which I found would no be very useful for a resident .the only plus point is that rosai has more immunohistochemistry but you can manage it from Harrison tables or dabbs immunohistochemistry tables .

Any idea when new sternberg is releasing considering the fact that the present one was released in 2010 and mostly a new one comes every 5 years

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[coroner]

I agree with over 9000.i found microscopy good in sternberg but theory better in rosai. So I combined stacey emills hitology with rosai .most of my seniors like grays more than koss for cytology.and thanks for afip advice.lets see the new edition of stenberg coming in feb 2015 .amisrys series are great .I have normal histology but it's quite expensive costing a lot for a few hundred pages sometimes I can get individual books like ezinger for a little more price.so was confused .

You seem to already have any idea of the differences based on your last thread. At this point it's a matter of opinion where half the people will tell you they like Rosai and the other half will say Sternberg and it's up to you to choose which format is more readable. Personally, I like Weidner...

 

[ravisingh007]

What's better in weidner compared to rosai and sternberg.

 

[Over9000]

My God man!