Bio Achiever???

[dsony2284]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

wow, anyone else think the bio achiever tests are really hard and really detailed. I mean everything i have pretty much seen before but the detail in which the questions are asked is quite overwhelming. Ive started reading so indepth now because i fear the real DAT bio is similar in detail? What do people think in comparing the two?

 

[Flipper405]

From what I've read, everything in general on the Achiever is significantly harder than the real thing. I think that's the point though... if you go into more detail than you actually need, you will reap the rewards come test day.

 

[TheWiredNerv]

I thought the PAT on achiever was comparable to the PAT on the DAT.

 

[dsony2284]

really? thats interesting, i have had people tell me the achiever/topscore PAT is harder than the real thing, then people tell me its mostly like topscore and you of course claiming it is similar to achiever. Well, if so thats good for me i have studied PAT using both topscoer and achiever. In topscore ive been getting 20-22, but achiever 16-18. angles in achiever seemed easy so did the front end top views. The hole punching was much harder than topscore and the cube counting was similar.

I take my test on thursday... im freaking dieing inside and im trying to go over everything i can today and just lightly review tommorow. I think i will go over as much of destroyer again today which i have gone over at least 10 times now. Any suggestions for other prep? sleep more maybe?