Books..

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

centigrad

New Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What are some important (or must-have) textbooks to buy?

General: Perez vs. Libel vs. Gunderson?

Radiobio: Anything other than Hall?

Physics: Anything other than Khan?

Others: should I get any CT imaging or RT planning books?


THanks!
 
Beside textbooks, are there any other reading materials / resources on the internet that are helpful?

Thanks again
 
centigrad said:
Beside textbooks, are there any other reading materials / resources on the internet that are helpful?

Thanks again

If you have access, Up-to-date is excellent review of the key trials in general clinical oncology. 👍
 
Get the Beaumont resident notes, if you know someone who has them.
 
NOTHING will take the place of resident note * you make yourself *. Whether they be powerpoint slides for presentation or your own notes. Others for guidelines are fine but trust me on this. They act as your primary learning, then later as a review. Its the difference between pass and fail, pain or gain. This is one of the strengths of the Hopkins program. I'm seeing this play out here where I am now, watching the residents in their program. Nothing like it.
 
Steph, Could you elaborate? What do you mean by "I'm seeing this play out here where I am now?"
cheers.
rk
 
Im watching the residents learn the difference between reviewing others notes and creating their own notes. Makes a big difference.
 
stephew said:
NOTHING will take the place of resident note * you make yourself *. Whether they be powerpoint slides for presentation or your own notes. Others for guidelines are fine but trust me on this. They act as your primary learning, then later as a review. Its the difference between pass and fail, pain or gain. This is one of the strengths of the Hopkins program. I'm seeing this play out here where I am now, watching the residents in their program. Nothing like it.

Steph, could you also elaborate on what you mean by this being "one of the strengths of the Hopkins program"? What I am trying to understand is if it is far better to be taking one's own notes for study purposes, so are the residents at Hopkins somehow being assisted towards that end? I generally would think it would be the other way around, that IF reviewing good notes handed down over the years (ie the incredible Beaumont files) is far better, then that would contribute to the program's strengths? 😕
 
well you can't be assisted in making your own notes! What I meant is that at jhh each monday a resident prepares a grand rounds level presentation fo rthe department. In this way you essentially prepare you own review of the topic. By the end of residency you've already made notes on several topics and it truely is a review for you by now, not learning the literature for the first time. What you may not realize is that knowing the literature is very different from doing rotations in the field. I could do prostate rotations for a year and still not know the literature, just the "habits" of how you treat one situation over another, at least in my institution.

Reviewing good notes in an inferior way of studying expect perhaps in the extreme case of youre being a very poor student, in which case youre not likely to be in rad onc in this climate. Someone else's note may point you in the direction of where you need to go, but oyu can't really learn by doing this and thus you'll need to review someone else's notes many times over more than you would youre own carefully prepared notes. Also, the literature is moving fast. last years notes wont be sufficient for some of this years topics, (ie head and neck, prostate, breast). Let alone from a few years ago. Also dont believe in the "beaumont" notes or the "harvard notes" etc. Ive seen all of these. Some are detailed; too detailed. Some are just plain wrong. Use others as a guide but from day one, start youre own files. you'll thank yourself later many times over.
 
stephew said:
well you can't be assisted in making your own notes! What I meant is that at jhh each monday a resident prepares a grand rounds level presentation fo rthe department. In this way you essentially prepare you own review of the topic. By the end of residency you've already made notes on several topics and it truely is a review for you by now, not learning the literature for the first time. What you may not realize is that knowing the literature is very different from doing rotations in the field. I could do prostate rotations for a year and still not know the literature, just the "habits" of how you treat one situation over another, at least in my institution.

Reviewing good notes in an inferior way of studying expect perhaps in the extreme case of youre being a very poor student, in which case youre not likely to be in rad onc in this climate. Someone else's note may point you in the direction of where you need to go, but oyu can't really learn by doing this and thus you'll need to review someone else's notes many times over more than you would youre own carefully prepared notes. Also, the literature is moving fast. last years notes wont be sufficient for some of this years topics, (ie head and neck, prostate, breast). Let alone from a few years ago. Also dont believe in the "beaumont" notes or the "harvard notes" etc. Ive seen all of these. Some are detailed; too detailed. Some are just plain wrong. Use others as a guide but from day one, start youre own files. you'll thank yourself later many times over.

Thank you Steph!
 
Thanks for the great insights, Steph
 
Top