D
deleted738762
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I feel as though the destroyer gen chem and oChem are way harder than what will be on the DAT. Some of the orgo reactions are just things I've never seen before. I think the destroyer is great for biology because it provides so much info in one question so I plan on doing that for sure but the chemistries are just a pain in the ass. Plus I've heard on SDN the destroyer chemistries are 2-3x harder than the DAT and more complex, so why bother stressing over a hard problem when I can use that time to learn more through practicing more DAT-like questions.
I noticed in bootcamp I can take subject specific tests and I like them because I can test myself and actually understand the questions after going through a topic & then the utilize actual practice tests, whereas destroyer I think is just like a foreign language. Plus I've seen people just use bootcamp and did just fine.
I plan (keyword plan) on doing both, but is it really worth going through the trouble of destroyer for chemistries. I keep hearing that organic is relatively simple and not too complex on the DAT, and gen chem is conceptual like chad's and Bootcamp. What do you think?
I noticed in bootcamp I can take subject specific tests and I like them because I can test myself and actually understand the questions after going through a topic & then the utilize actual practice tests, whereas destroyer I think is just like a foreign language. Plus I've seen people just use bootcamp and did just fine.
I plan (keyword plan) on doing both, but is it really worth going through the trouble of destroyer for chemistries. I keep hearing that organic is relatively simple and not too complex on the DAT, and gen chem is conceptual like chad's and Bootcamp. What do you think?