I never said that. I think you are not taking an informed approach to applying to medical school, and if you don't heed the errors that people here are trying to steer you away from, applying to art school will be just as effective in securing for yourself a career in medicine as applying to medical school. No one is telling you not to do what you enjoy. Just realize that the value you are assigning to it will not likely be matched by admissions committee members, and that you should not place the emphasis you seem to want to place on it in your applications.
Sometimes it takes a tough dose of realism to crystallize a point, especially to a mind fogged by self-delusion and ill-guided ambition. That was nice of you to send the RossU link. I think I heard about that school on the radio once. Do you know if it's a good school? I hope they like american applicants there. Maybe I can tell them about the posters I make for every New York Knicks game that I go to and that after the games I give them to the homeless to shield them from the rain. I feel like I give back to society in a huge way by doing that. Don't you? Sometimes I'll draw posters in my backyard, even if it's really hot out. One time I helped my uncle build a shed in my backyard and then I told people I helped out with a humane mission. I think medical schools will say I have a good work ethic. Maybe RossU will say that too!
your sarcasm is misguided. the part about injury/humane organization was in reference to someone else's post about stand in **** all day under 100 degree whether in order to get into med school.
here's the way i look at it
we all know that successful matriculants have around 150 hrs of clinical expose, a year of research, and some other odds and ends in addition to solid numbers.
if i can exceed all those categories (clinical exposure, community service, research, tutoring, honors thesis, international experience) and have additonal, unique, and meaningful/substantial artistic endeavors on top, then that will only work in my favor. do you not agree?
say i have 600 hrs of combined service experience when i apply. the fact i have 600 hours of "relevant" experience in addition to substantial artistic endeavors will look better than someone who only have 300 hrs of relevant experience but nothing else "non-medical", even if that person claims a "better commitment to medicine" because he/she did nothing else in addition to it.
again, if you already have a solid amount of all the experiences that adcoms look for (volunteer, shadowing, research, tutoring, community service, honors thesis, etc.), then your time and your application will be better off if you spend it on something else....esepcially when that something else transcends just a silly hobby.
and your implicit notion that what i am doing constitutes nothing more than some random/silly hobby is, quite honestly, offensive.
lastly, you seem to think that all i have is my artistic endeavor and nothing else. that's simply not true. my ECs are solid/well rounded, and the additional of something unique and substantial outside of medicine doesn't diminish my other ECs
i get a feeling that you (and many others on this tread) feel this way:
applicant A: has 300 hours clinical experience, nothing
applicant B: has 400 hours clinical experience, but 2000 hours of art
conclusion: applicant A is better suited to medicine because he/she is "more dedicated"