- Joined
- Jun 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,892
- Reaction score
- 1,863
As if you didn't already need a reason to cancel your membership to that terrible organization, read this
http://www.pharmacist.com/new-federal-overtime-rules-likely-have-implications-pharmacy-residents
APhA has finally been exposed. They don't like the fact that residencies, who get pharmacist work at 1/3rd the going rate, will now have to pay overtime to pharmacy residents. I thought APhA was supposed to represent the pharmacy profession! No! Don't pay us the overtime pay pharmacists deserve! Provider status!
Funding limited? **** you Thomas Menighan! This is what you get for pushing these cheap labor programs onto the profession.
http://www.pharmacist.com/new-federal-overtime-rules-likely-have-implications-pharmacy-residents
New federal rules could raise pharmacy residents’ salary as pharmacy resident programs must comply with a final rule issued by the Department of Labor (DoL) that takes effect December 1, 2016.
Employers must increase minimum salary for certain employees to keep them exempt from wage regulations, such as those related to overtime pay. According to APhA, the final rule does not exempt pharmacy residents, leaving them among the millions of health care workers who will soon see a bigger paycheck.
Under the final rule, the initial increase to the Fair Labor Standards Act minimum salary level to qualify for an exemption is from $455 to $913 per week (i.e., from $23,660 to $47,476 annually). Future automatic updates to the thresholds will occur every 3 years, starting on January 1, 2020.
Practicing physicians—including medical residents—are not entitled to a minimum salary or overtime because they qualify for an exemption for the practice of medicine. According to APhA comments to DoL, pharmacy residents should qualify for the same exemption as medical residents because pharmacists cannot accept a residency until they have completed their PharmD—just as medical residents must complete specialized education before being permitted to practice as a resident.
APhA wrote in comments to DoL on its proposed rule that the new rules could place a prohibitive strain on already cash-strapped residency training programs, particularly those that are community-based, and could have a damaging effect on patients.
APhA also requested more flexibility in the implementation of the new rule.
“Without proper time to plan for salary increases,” the Association wrote, “entities, many of which are community pharmacies as well as small businesses, may face budget constraints and some may be forced to discontinue these important programs that assist in training pharmacists as clinical care providers.”
Pharmacy technicians may be affected by the DoL final rule, depending on their job duties.
APhA has finally been exposed. They don't like the fact that residencies, who get pharmacist work at 1/3rd the going rate, will now have to pay overtime to pharmacy residents. I thought APhA was supposed to represent the pharmacy profession! No! Don't pay us the overtime pay pharmacists deserve! Provider status!
Funding limited? **** you Thomas Menighan! This is what you get for pushing these cheap labor programs onto the profession.