Cardiac Anesthesia

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Dryacku

Member
10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2006
Messages
186
Reaction score
1
Do any of you have much experience with cardiac anesthesia? I find it very interesting and much more stimulating then other cases Ive seen so far (besides trauma and transplant)....
Is there a need for cardiac anesthesia? Is pay greater? Is the training more intense or can anybody do it? also are crnas certfied to do these cases?
also is it necessary to do a fellowship?
just some general info would be helpful...


thanks

Members don't see this ad.
 
Do any of you have much experience with cardiac anesthesia?
More than I want

I find it very interesting and much more stimulating then other cases Ive seen so far (besides trauma and transplant)....
not

Is there a need for cardiac anesthesia?
Not any more than any other

Is pay greater?
depends on what the patient's insurance is.

Is the training more intense or can anybody do it?
Depends on what type of fellowship you do.

also are crnas certfied to do these cases?
yes, a LOT of crnas do hearts.

also is it necessary to do a fellowship?
no


just some general info would be helpful...
there you go


You're welcome
 
Dryacku said:
Do any of you have much experience with cardiac anesthesia? I find it very interesting and much more stimulating then other cases Ive seen so far (besides trauma and transplant)....
Is there a need for cardiac anesthesia? Is pay greater? Is the training more intense or can anybody do it? also are crnas certfied to do these cases?
also is it necessary to do a fellowship?
just some general info would be helpful...


thanks

In the past year in private practice, I have so far done about 110 - 120 hearts, mostly CABG's and AVR's with or without root replacements, with a few Ross procedures, MVR's, TVR's, and open or closed chest MAZE and TMR procedures. In other words, there is plenty out there in private practice.

There is a need in the sense that not many people want to do cardiac anesthesia because pay for it sucks. For a 4-5 hour off pump CABG, you bill 25 base points, plus about 20 points for art line, central lines, and PAC, and TEE (TEE is usually not paid for unless you do a complete exam plus have justification for doing it like preexisting A-fib, aortic aneurysm, etc.). For a 4-5 hour case, you would add another 20 points. So 65 points sounds great. At a medicare rate of 12-15 dollars/point, it adds up to about $800 (after throwing out the TEE, although in Texas you can now get reimbursed about $100 for TEE if your patient has < 30% EF documented in your report). Compare that with 4 hours of ENT or lap chole's or lap bands (roughly $2,000-$3,000 of billing). As Jet stated on another post, you need to find a practice with a low medicare/medicaid/free rate of reimbursement, but especially if you want to do a lot of cardiac and you are getting paid what you bill straight up. A young, privately insured patient turns that 65 point case into a 40-90 dollar/point reimbursement scenario.

Every anesthesiologist gets at least some cardiac training in residency, so you can do it in private practice without a fellowship. However, you better hope that a complication that you never saw in training doesn't all of a sudden rear its ugly head and you better hope your surgeon doesn't ask you to do a TEE exam in that case. That happened to a guy in a facility I don't have priveleges at nor do I want to have priveleges at, but the surgeon ends up calling me asking me to go there to "proctor" the person doing the cardiac anesthesia for the case, because after the patient is in the room for 1.5 hours, the case still had not started and when the patient's pulmonary pressures skyrocketed, the surgeon asked where the TEE was to evaluate whether or not the patient's preop AI or MR had significantly worsened (which it would in this case with the manipulation of the heart for off pump).

Can CRNA's do these cases? Yes with supervision, but not the TEE's which is a critical part of cardiac anesthesia, especially as you see fewer straight forward CABG's coming out of the cath labs and more valve repairs and replacements coming in.

If you plan to do hearts without a fellowship, you had better be sure that you do a ton in residency and get tons of experience with the TEE probe. In residency, I used my rotations at private practice facilities as round the clock cardiac rotations, using TEE in cardiac cases as well as liver transplants. I finished with 186 documented cardiac cases in residency as well as over 240 recorded TEE examinations. If your residency cannot provide you with at least 50-100 cardiac cases, I would advise you to spare yourself the future close calls in the heart room and do the cardiac fellowship, if you are truly interested in doing cardiac at least partly in private practice. The training you would receive would also make you a stronger clinician in general. You have to decide if another year of education is worth the cost of a year of pay ($45-$55K pay as a fellow versus $200-$350K in your first year in private practice). I chose the latter because I made my third year my cardiac fellowship.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
I'm sure there are others who know the details better than I do, but my understanding is the organization who "certifies" people to perform TEE is no longer certifying anesthesiologists based on case numbers in residency but rather requiring an actual cardiac fellowship. That is to say, no cardiac fellowship, no intra-op TEE, and, thus, no big cardiac cases. There was a thread about this a month or so ago...
 
cchoukal said:
I'm sure there are others who know the details better than I do, but my understanding is the organization who "certifies" people to perform TEE is no longer certifying anesthesiologists based on case numbers in residency but rather requiring an actual cardiac fellowship. That is to say, no cardiac fellowship, no intra-op TEE, and, thus, no big cardiac cases. There was a thread about this a month or so ago...

2008 is when that fellowship situation is supposed to go into effect.
 
cchoukal said:
Right, which means that anyone who is currently a resident CA2 or below will be affected by this.

This affects your ability to get advanced certification. You can still get basic certification which is enough in most hospitals to allow you to use TEE.
 
NBE Extends Practice Experience Pathway to Certification in Perioperative TEE

We have just received a very important announcement from the National Board of Echocardiography (NBE): The Board of Directors of the NBE have just adopted a major policy change whereby physicians who complete their core residency training BEFORE July 1, 2009 will forever be able to follow the Practice Experience Pathway to certification in Perioperative TEE. This is a VERY significant change and of great relevance to SCA members.

From SCA

With regard to certification, there are testamurs and diplomates.

Testamur: Someone who has passed an examination of special competence administered by the National Board of Echocardiography.

Diplomate: Someone who has successfully completed the Certification process: i.e. has passed an Examination of Special Competence administered by the National Board of Echocardiography, has documented training in cardiovascular disease, has extended training in echocardiography, and has maintained these skills for a minimum of 2 years prior to applying for certification.

One of the things I've wondered is, how much better would I be in an overall way if I did a fellowship (something like cardiac or neuro rather than OB or regional) than if I spent that year in private practice.
 
Top