CDP Angles + Cubes vs. real DAT.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

herkulease

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
898
Reaction score
2
I'm wondering for those that have taken the DAT are the angle differences anything like the ones on CDP. I don't have issues with obvious differences its the ones where its only 3-4 degree differences between them.

And for cube counting, what about floating ones. I've ran into a couple where they are essentially unsupported. the explanation notes that its an illusion not sure what they meant by that. But I could have sworn cubes can't merely be floating and the bottom ones touches the surface.

if someone shows me how to grab the screen I'll find that question. or will a simple screen print do the trick?
 
I know the general consensus is that the real DAT does not have illusions, and I think a majority of people find angles to be slightly easier on the real thing. Angles are definitely my downfall on crack dat.
 
Top