- Joined
- May 17, 2010
- Messages
- 794
- Reaction score
- 28
EDIT: I REVISED THIS POST. I KNOW ITS LONG BUT I'D REALLY APPRECIATE IT IF SOMEONE COULD PLEASE HELP ME CLEAR THIS UP!
I don't quite understand how we define centripetal force as I feel that the definition changes depending on whether we are talking about horizontal vs. vertical circular motion. If you don't mind, could you please critique my train of thought. I'm certain that I my explanation contains some inconsistencies, but I am not sure where my understanding is incorrect.
Here it goes:
It is to my understanding that vertical circular motion cannot be considered uniform given that the magnitude AND direction of the centripetal force acting on the object continually changes (and thus centripetal acceleration continually changes) depending on its position in its circular path. In other words, centripetal motion in the vertical direction is non-uniform.
I'd like to start off by defining what I think is centripetal force. Centripetal force (which I believe in not a real force) is the force placed on an object in order to maintain circular motion. The reason why I don't consider it a real force is because it is other forces (e.g., normal force, force of friction, tension, etc.) that constitute the centripetal force.
The particular question I having trouble with is a roller coaster cart that travels around a circular loop-de-loop (an example of vertical circular motion). I'd like to first define certain positions of the loop-de-loop to describe what I am talking about. Let the bottom of the loop be the 6 o'clock position, the top of the loop be the 12 o'clock position, and the right side of the loop (half way UP the loop) be the 3 o'clock position. At the top of the loop (12 o'clock position), the forces acting on the cart are the normal force (which points down) and the force of gravity (mg), which also points down. Many people claim that the normal force at this position is at its minimum (approaches 0) when we are considering the minimum speed required for the cart to complete the loop. In other words, it is the force of gravity that "provides" the centripetal force (i.e., the force required to maintain circular motion). Now, the reason I mention this is because I want to use this first example to define centripetal force. Both forces acting on the object are pointing straight down (which ALSO happens to be the centre of the circle) and so the NET force acting on the object is also down (and thus also towards the centre). Therefore, we can say that the NET force (which is the vector sum of the real component forces – i.e., force of gravity and normal force) is the centripetal force.
Now lets take a look at another instance in time. Lets imagine that the cart is at the 3 o'clock position (half way UP the loop). At this position, I do NOT see how we can equate the centripetal force with the net force acting on the object. The force which provides the centripetal force is the normal force (i.e., the normal force points directly inward towards the centre of the loop), however, the force of gravity now points downwards (as it always does) and not in the same direction as the normal force (as was the case when the cart was at the 12 o'clock position). Therefore, if the net force acting on the object is the vector sum of the component forces acting on the object (i.e., force of gravity and normal force), then the net force does not point towards the centre of the loop. In fact, the net force will point inwards, but it will not point towards the centre. If you need to see a picture of what this would look like, take a look at the figure "right side of loop" on this website (http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/circmot/rcd.cfm). My point is, we can still maintain circular motion because at any given position, the NET force always points INWARD towards the the centre of the circle. What I don't understand is: How is it that people always equate centripetal force (which always points towards the centre of the circle and is perpendicular to the tangential velocity of the object) to the net force acting on the object to solve centripetal motion problems when we can clearly see that at certain positions the centripetal force does not equal the net force acting on the object.
Other sources to consider: http://dev.physicslab.org/Document.aspx?doctype=3&filename=OscillatoryMotion_VerticalCircles.xml
I really appreciate your time in helping me figure this out. I am having a lot of trouble understanding this part of the dynamics unit.
Regards,
Lunasly.
I don't quite understand how we define centripetal force as I feel that the definition changes depending on whether we are talking about horizontal vs. vertical circular motion. If you don't mind, could you please critique my train of thought. I'm certain that I my explanation contains some inconsistencies, but I am not sure where my understanding is incorrect.
Here it goes:
It is to my understanding that vertical circular motion cannot be considered uniform given that the magnitude AND direction of the centripetal force acting on the object continually changes (and thus centripetal acceleration continually changes) depending on its position in its circular path. In other words, centripetal motion in the vertical direction is non-uniform.
I'd like to start off by defining what I think is centripetal force. Centripetal force (which I believe in not a real force) is the force placed on an object in order to maintain circular motion. The reason why I don't consider it a real force is because it is other forces (e.g., normal force, force of friction, tension, etc.) that constitute the centripetal force.
The particular question I having trouble with is a roller coaster cart that travels around a circular loop-de-loop (an example of vertical circular motion). I'd like to first define certain positions of the loop-de-loop to describe what I am talking about. Let the bottom of the loop be the 6 o'clock position, the top of the loop be the 12 o'clock position, and the right side of the loop (half way UP the loop) be the 3 o'clock position. At the top of the loop (12 o'clock position), the forces acting on the cart are the normal force (which points down) and the force of gravity (mg), which also points down. Many people claim that the normal force at this position is at its minimum (approaches 0) when we are considering the minimum speed required for the cart to complete the loop. In other words, it is the force of gravity that "provides" the centripetal force (i.e., the force required to maintain circular motion). Now, the reason I mention this is because I want to use this first example to define centripetal force. Both forces acting on the object are pointing straight down (which ALSO happens to be the centre of the circle) and so the NET force acting on the object is also down (and thus also towards the centre). Therefore, we can say that the NET force (which is the vector sum of the real component forces – i.e., force of gravity and normal force) is the centripetal force.
Now lets take a look at another instance in time. Lets imagine that the cart is at the 3 o'clock position (half way UP the loop). At this position, I do NOT see how we can equate the centripetal force with the net force acting on the object. The force which provides the centripetal force is the normal force (i.e., the normal force points directly inward towards the centre of the loop), however, the force of gravity now points downwards (as it always does) and not in the same direction as the normal force (as was the case when the cart was at the 12 o'clock position). Therefore, if the net force acting on the object is the vector sum of the component forces acting on the object (i.e., force of gravity and normal force), then the net force does not point towards the centre of the loop. In fact, the net force will point inwards, but it will not point towards the centre. If you need to see a picture of what this would look like, take a look at the figure "right side of loop" on this website (http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/circmot/rcd.cfm). My point is, we can still maintain circular motion because at any given position, the NET force always points INWARD towards the the centre of the circle. What I don't understand is: How is it that people always equate centripetal force (which always points towards the centre of the circle and is perpendicular to the tangential velocity of the object) to the net force acting on the object to solve centripetal motion problems when we can clearly see that at certain positions the centripetal force does not equal the net force acting on the object.
Other sources to consider: http://dev.physicslab.org/Document.aspx?doctype=3&filename=OscillatoryMotion_VerticalCircles.xml
I really appreciate your time in helping me figure this out. I am having a lot of trouble understanding this part of the dynamics unit.
Regards,
Lunasly.
Last edited: