Cerebellar Mets

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Ray D. Ayshun

Full Member
Lifetime Donor
10+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
3,598
Reaction score
6,602
Points
6,961
I'm about to SBRT a patient with metastatic esophageal cancer with several cerebellar mets but nothing in the brainstem or supratentorium. I was just wondering if there's a molecular reason for some cancers to prefer over or under the tentorium.
 
I'm about to SBRT a patient with metastatic esophageal cancer with several cerebellar mets but nothing in the brainstem or supratentorium. I was just wondering if there's a molecular reason for some cancers to prefer over or under the tentorium.
What part of the esophagus and have there been any virchow or supraclav mets
 
What part of the esophagus and have there been any virchow or supraclav mets
Distal, adeno. HER2+. No SCV mets. Bilateral adrenal though.

Edit: By mentioning HER2+ to you, it led me to this

 
There is some neurotropism by pathology. It isn't strong, but there are some known predilctions.
 
I think it depends on where the first cancer cells cross the BBB.... if it's in the cerebellum then more likely to get cerebellar mets, vice-versa. Unless uncontrolled extracranial tumor continues to seed other regions. Generlaly the folks I see with one vs the other (cerebellum vs not) have controlled extracranial disease, and it's microsopic disease in the brain that declares itself going forwrad. In some situations I've seen and done posterior fossa 30/10 rather than WBRT if tentorium is unaffected, when SRS is no longer an option.
 
Top Bottom