- Joined
- Feb 18, 2016
- Messages
- 184
- Reaction score
- 408
Other insurers to follow suit?
This seems like it could be a big problem for practices that do 4:1 with qz to get full billing. Am I remembering right that qk is reimbursed at half of qz so most practices that can do qz bill that?
There are no provisions in CMS regulations or the laws of any state to allow that. It's absurd on it's face. It got shot down in Arizona a couple weeks ago - the only one voting for it was the sponsor of the amendment to the bill.What happens if CRNAs supervise AAs under qz
"Additionally, as part of the R39 reimbursement policy implementation, we will administratively deny the anesthesia CPT code with the lowest base unit on claims submitted with multiple codes, and reimburse the code with the highest base unit. We will reimburse the first code submitted if the base units are equal."
highest unit ?! so nice
might be issue here. we cover crna 1 to 1.
yes financially its bad for groups. but at same time its hard to justify inferior work for same pay. i think they are two different points.This is nothing to cheer about. There are plenty of private groups that have physicians do their own cases, but don't have the staff for placing an md in an eye room or endo room. Qz collections keep the group viable. This is another nail in the coffin for private groups without a large hospital subsidy.