- Joined
- Oct 13, 2010
- Messages
- 11,020
- Reaction score
- 169
Now... since there have been an abundance of trolls in Pre-Allo lately, let's try to get some serious dialogue going. My fellow late night 2016ers have been discussing the frivolity of the current admissions process and what we'd like to see in a medical school curriculum.
WARNING: This is long... but should make it interesting for your preparation for interviews and applications. Should provide some insight into learning how to evaluate curriculum models and ask certain types of questions to your interviews.
We'd love to hear your comments, suggestions and ideas. Something you don't like? Something missing... just post and discuss.
The ideal admissions process...
-Keep AMCAS the same as it is now.
-Have the student complete pre-reqs in biology, chem, physics, organic I, cell biology/physiology, biochemistry and statistics.
-They will write the MCAT, but it will not be weighed heavily in the admissions decision. More of a low screen (7s in each section with a minimum composite of 25). We are keeping the MCAT since our school of Medicine will not be the only school the applicants apply to. Thus, we would like to use their MCAT scores for a preliminary screen
-People with GPAs less than 3.3 without a steep upward trend will be recommended to complete a post-bacc (informal or formal) to prove they can handle the curriculum.
-Will have an admissions tracker like UMich (Best thing ever!) Will be completely transparent with the process. No qualms about discussing an application (after all, you're paying us to apply to our school) while the application is in progress.
-After applicants submit their primary AMCAS... a knowledge/problem solving based test on the pre-reqs... but that is unlike the MCAT will be presented to them to complete at a prometric testing center. I will call it the CTBT. This will be our secondary application, thus the fee for a secondary is eliminated but replaced with the cost of this test.
CTBT = Critical Thinking Based Test
About the CTBT, and why it is better.
First... why it is better. The MCAT claims to test critical thinking ability. But in reality, with enough practice you can "beat" the test. Doesn't mean you're prepared for medical school necessarily. The goal of the CTBT is to see if you can think on your feet, and integrate the knowledge you have, with brand new facts. And to form an argument for and against the material presented.
-Will resemble the current biological sciences of the MCAT with a bit of a twist. 2 sections, one on psychological principles (AKA a personality test), other will be a biochem/physiology/cell bio mash up.
-Tests some factual based knowledge.
-Most of the emphasis however is on taking information and being able to present it back to the examiner.
Example. Passage dealing with cystic fibrosis, describes etiology, molecular and genetic basis, pathology, treatment, relevant basic anatomy. Then shows a research article challenging previously accepted principles on cystic fibrosis. The candidate would have to argue for and against the new research much like the MCAT WS asks you to formulate a thesis, antithesis, synthesis. Evidence-Based Medicine FTW!
-There will be 4 such passages that incorporate all aspects of the pre-med curriculum and the thinking required to succeed in medicine.
-There will be 20 discrete questions that determine your ability to memorize random info. But this will be clearly outlined in a syllabus.
-20 minutes for each passage, and 1 minute for each of the discretes...100 minutes total.
-Then a short 30 question psychological assessment to determine personality type. Can't have too many INTJs and no ENFJs in one class.
This test would cost the applicants whatever it costs the school to implement it and design the questions.
Applicants who meet the minimum academic criteria, and score above the 70-80th percentile on the CTBT will be given first preference for interviews after a closer examination of their file/LORs. Then interviews will go out as space is available.
-Final step in the admissions process is the interview which will consist of an MMI and a 30 minute 1-on-1 faculty member interview. MMI for 90 minutes. With an optional 30 minute tour. And a 30 minute intro. This gives our interview day a total of 3 hours without lunch.
WARNING: This is long... but should make it interesting for your preparation for interviews and applications. Should provide some insight into learning how to evaluate curriculum models and ask certain types of questions to your interviews.
We'd love to hear your comments, suggestions and ideas. Something you don't like? Something missing... just post and discuss.
The ideal admissions process...
-Keep AMCAS the same as it is now.
-Have the student complete pre-reqs in biology, chem, physics, organic I, cell biology/physiology, biochemistry and statistics.
-They will write the MCAT, but it will not be weighed heavily in the admissions decision. More of a low screen (7s in each section with a minimum composite of 25). We are keeping the MCAT since our school of Medicine will not be the only school the applicants apply to. Thus, we would like to use their MCAT scores for a preliminary screen
-People with GPAs less than 3.3 without a steep upward trend will be recommended to complete a post-bacc (informal or formal) to prove they can handle the curriculum.
-Will have an admissions tracker like UMich (Best thing ever!) Will be completely transparent with the process. No qualms about discussing an application (after all, you're paying us to apply to our school) while the application is in progress.
-After applicants submit their primary AMCAS... a knowledge/problem solving based test on the pre-reqs... but that is unlike the MCAT will be presented to them to complete at a prometric testing center. I will call it the CTBT. This will be our secondary application, thus the fee for a secondary is eliminated but replaced with the cost of this test.
CTBT = Critical Thinking Based Test
About the CTBT, and why it is better.
First... why it is better. The MCAT claims to test critical thinking ability. But in reality, with enough practice you can "beat" the test. Doesn't mean you're prepared for medical school necessarily. The goal of the CTBT is to see if you can think on your feet, and integrate the knowledge you have, with brand new facts. And to form an argument for and against the material presented.
-Will resemble the current biological sciences of the MCAT with a bit of a twist. 2 sections, one on psychological principles (AKA a personality test), other will be a biochem/physiology/cell bio mash up.
-Tests some factual based knowledge.
-Most of the emphasis however is on taking information and being able to present it back to the examiner.
Example. Passage dealing with cystic fibrosis, describes etiology, molecular and genetic basis, pathology, treatment, relevant basic anatomy. Then shows a research article challenging previously accepted principles on cystic fibrosis. The candidate would have to argue for and against the new research much like the MCAT WS asks you to formulate a thesis, antithesis, synthesis. Evidence-Based Medicine FTW!
-There will be 4 such passages that incorporate all aspects of the pre-med curriculum and the thinking required to succeed in medicine.
-There will be 20 discrete questions that determine your ability to memorize random info. But this will be clearly outlined in a syllabus.
-20 minutes for each passage, and 1 minute for each of the discretes...100 minutes total.
-Then a short 30 question psychological assessment to determine personality type. Can't have too many INTJs and no ENFJs in one class.
This test would cost the applicants whatever it costs the school to implement it and design the questions.
Applicants who meet the minimum academic criteria, and score above the 70-80th percentile on the CTBT will be given first preference for interviews after a closer examination of their file/LORs. Then interviews will go out as space is available.
-Final step in the admissions process is the interview which will consist of an MMI and a 30 minute 1-on-1 faculty member interview. MMI for 90 minutes. With an optional 30 minute tour. And a 30 minute intro. This gives our interview day a total of 3 hours without lunch.
Last edited: