I am rotating in PBCGME now, as a core student. I will agree that Feurer and Matese (his consigliere) are hard-asses, and sticklers for professionalism. They chose academically superior candidates, and then hold them to the highest standards of professionalism. But they also give preference to core students. Since the FM program is relatively new, I've been told that they had some challenges that they weeded out. That process apparently was disruptive and ticked off the residents who "didn't cut it". The vast majority of PBCGME residents I've worked with are very smart, really nice and really happy residents. They help each other, and enjoy teaching. Speaking to my classmates doing rotations in "nonprofit" hospitals, I think HCA has their act together more than most. They are dumping a lot of money into these programs to graduate quality residents that will stay with the company. I guess it's working, because a lot of the attendings, including EM, IM, Psych, and Peds, are graduates from the program. We rotate through four HCA hospitals, and HCA is anal-compulsive when it comes to quality, and accreditation standards. THIS is especially the case for PBCGME. You will be challenged to meet compliance requirements of the hospital and the programs. Sometimes this can be a little overwhelming, and causes you to focus on compliance when all you want to do is learn about your patients. By the way, the food is free, the parking is free and, while I am biased because I grew up in South Florida (Go NOLES!), the beaches are amazing. While some of the programs (like FM) are new, this overall program is older than I am. Along with students from NSU, they also take cores from KCUMB and PCOM (only GA, I think). I hear rumor that they, along with the ACGME merger, are thinking about starting a new rad-onc residency.