Columbia vs UCSF: Thank you!

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Undecided_Mango

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2020
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Decision: I ended up going with Columbia! Leaving this up in case it helps anyone in the future (I know there were very few posts with Columbia / I don't think any Columbia/ UCSF in recent times.

Columbia VP&S
Pros
  • More well known outside of science/ internationally / Ivy League reputation
  • Narrative medicine (&Siddhartha Mukherjee)
  • College of Surgeons and Surgeons
  • Has other graduate schools & undergrad (big network)
  • more familiar with weather, type of people etc
  • Standardized patients are apparently phenomenal at acting
  • P&S club (basically a massive service club) & free clinic system
  • interviewers offered to be my mentors
  • Deans emphasized how they know people at programs all over the country and will pick up the phone to get you there.
  • Exams every 4 weeks done on your computer at home over the entire weekend. Awesome.
  • More layperson prestige
  • Vagelos Education Center
  • Artsy city
  • Preclinical curriculum commute is right next door
  • 4 year housing options
  • Seasons and variety (Like how a sunny 50 degree day in March feels great in the spring)
  • Offered WAY more financial aid
  • Don’t really have to worry about driving/ parking because of public transportation (shuttles, buses, and trains)
  • multiple choice exams
  • class size (~138)
  • Take classes with dental students
Cons:
  • Bard Hall (from gap year living back into dorm life....apparently apartments are easy to get though closeby)
  • Winter windchill/ snow
I don’t know/ not necessarily pro or con:
  • Washington Heights/ Uptown Manhattan
  • Private
  • Semester system
  • STEP 1 after preclinical clinical (Thank you meronebib)

University of California San Francisco (UCSF)

Pros
  • accessible nature
  • 3 years of true pass-fail both preclinical & clinical (Columbia has 1.5 years for their preclinical)
  • Bridges curriculum
  • Take a class during preclinical with other health professions (dental, nursing, etc)
  • In state tuition after 1 year
  • I’ve been told more relaxed than east coast
  • Tech hub
  • Went to college on East Coast, so never experienced west coast life/ education/ etc.
  • Weather
  • STEP 1 after Clinical (more likely the pass-fail time)
  • Don’t know how true this is, but generally people seemed friendlier (ex. Random people acknowledging me/ saying hi/ have a nice day as I walk along the street or chat in an elevator)
Cons
  • Only has some other grad schools (mainly health).
  • Less well known outside of health (less layperson prestige)
  • I don’t know how true this is, but it seems like I would have to more actively search for mentors compared to Columbia
  • 2 year limit on housing option
  • Older facilities
  • global health stuff seems more create-your-own
  • need a car but parking/ traffic is rough
  • Offered less financial aid
I don’t know if pro or con:
  • Short answer exams
  • San Francisco
  • Public
  • Class size is larger (~165)
  • Quarter system
  • New Division of Palliative Medicine (it is new, so not sure if that is good or bad)
  • Rumor of going free tuition soon
Both:

Pros:
  • Research powerhouse
  • Equally ranked in USnews for research
  • Electives
  • I loved my interviewers & interview day
  • Non-mandatory classes
  • Beautiful views and cities
  • Has community pipeline programs
  • Patient interaction starting first year
  • City life
  • 1.5 year preclinical (not too fast and not too dragged out)
  • Place I have never lived
  • Don’t really have to worry about driving/ parking because of public transportation (shuttles, buses, and trains) not true for San Francisco(Thank you EnterpriseStar for your detailed description of San Francisco as a native. It was truly helpful!)
  • Enjoyed interview food at both places
Cons:
  • Cost of living
Thank you so much!
 
Last edited:
"Don’t really have to worry about driving/ parking because of public transportation (shuttles, buses, and trains)"

You'll need a car to survive in the SF bay area, unless you plan on holing up in SF and never leaving the city. (But then you miss the great nature a few hours away, delicious food spread around East and South Bay ~1 hour or less away)

Parking within SF is often a hassle, and don't underestimate Bay Area traffic; it really does get as bad as LA traffic some days.

Even within the city, BART and Muni (and to some degree, Caltrain) are gross and inconvenient; trains and buses are often old, crowded, random homeless people, needles and mystery stains.

San Francisco is now mostly techies, expensive food/Cost of Living, poop in the streets. I only go into the city for concerts and to visit my many friends & family there.

Source: Bay Area resident of 20+ years
 
Top