What are the three coolest cases you did as an intern? I'm talking about actually doing it...not being the third or fourth person scrubbed and being the Yankauer jockey or driving camera...if you want you can tell us the name of your program. 🙂
What are the three coolest cases you did as an intern? I'm talking about actually doing it...not being the third or fourth person scrubbed and being the Yankauer jockey or driving camera...if you want you can tell us the name of your program. 🙂
For many of us, the cases we did as interns where we were doing at least 50% of the case will never qualify as "cool". Its been a long time for me, but they would probably all be inguinal and ventral hernias.
lap inguinal hernia repair with mesh
huge a$$ meningioma resection (looked like a head growing out of a head)
VATS (I love thoracic now!)
axillary lymph node dissection for melanoma
i did ONE as an intern, is it that far fetched?ALND for an intern?
i did ONE as an intern, is it that far fetched?
did someone say lap spleen and lap inguinal hernia as an intern? that's pretty amazing considering most interns can't even place trochars without help. i kind of consider both these cases too be "advanced" since you can really hurt someone if you don't know what you're doing. where i train, the lap fellows get real hard ons for these cases. i mean, i know some community surgeons who will send those cases to the university, especially if they don't have a fellowship trained laparoscopist in their group.
let me first start by saying that most residentsa t my program (and by direction fo our PD) consider "doing" the case as hoving two compnentsI think his point was that those (AND and lap hernias) are not commonly done surgeries by junior residents and are ones with a far amount of potential complications; I wasn't comfortable with AXND until the end of fellowship, so its hard to understand someone allowing an intern to do the case.
Perhaps some of us here differ in our definition of what doing the case is. If the attending is doing the dissection and holding the tissue for you to Bovie, it doesn't count as doing the case.
i did ONE as an intern, is it that far fetched?
let me first start by saying that most residentsa t my program (and by direction fo our PD) consider "doing" the case as hoving two compnents
1. performed about 50% or greater of the case
2. performed some part of the "actual operation" in some significant fashion
So i certainly dont think "doing" necessarily means skin to skin especially as residents
let me first start by saying that most residentsa t my program (and by direction fo our PD) consider "doing" the case as hoving two compnents
1. performed about 50% or greater of the case
2. performed some part of the "actual operation" in some significant fashion
So i certainly dont think "doing" necessarily means skin to skin especially as residents
generally i agree and understand where you are coming fromPerforming 50% of more of the case is required by ABS for you to record yourself as Surgeon Junior and was the qualifier I was using to define "doing" the case. Just some of the cases listed above seem to be a little more advanced than I've seen residents do at any hospital i've worked at. Again, I think sometimes junior residents think that doing the case means cutting all the tissue the attending gives them to do, when the real work is the dissection.
Perhaps the difference is definitions as above or in resident autonomy as Castro notes. If it is the former, then I can list plenty of cases in which I probably did 50% but didn't do the "critical" portion of the case (ie, the anastomosis). But it likely could be the latter...no way was I ever doing the dissection in the axilla or doing G-J anastomoses as an intern. I was lucky if I got to do more than drive the camera, fool around with the bag a bit and close the portholes while the 2nd or 3rd year did most of the case in a lap chole.
But here's the deal: a lot of interns get to operate, but under no circumstances am I doing things alone. I have an attending at my side watching me closely, guiding me each step of the way. I am by no means doing the thinking part of the surgery by myself, I'm just proving that you actually can teach monkeys to operate.
And even though I get to do a lot, I know I'm not running a room by myself, with the attending not there or not scrubbing in. That's the major leagues meant for my seniors. I'm just in AA ball, but still having a good time. 🙂
generally i agree and understand where you are coming from
BUT
im telling you that some interns who the attendings trust get to do more
I did a G-J anastmosis as an intern
I did a VATS wedge biopsy skin to skin
it happens
I have two very different experiences
In med school, its was very traditional
Interns did not close fascia on exlaps
Interns were lucky to get to doa lap chole skin to skin, some didnt do one at all
As a resident, im in a community program
while it varies hosptial to hospital and attending to attending
some interns get to do more than others
I suppose not, but it's hard to imagine as Winged Scapula mentioned. Maybe it's because both she trained and I'm wrapping up my training in the Northeast, where autonomy isn't so tangible as it is in the South or Midwest (?).
You and I got in an argument a while back about a similar topic. I guess what frustrates me is that people in the Northeast have a certain amount of tunnel vision, and tend to assume that their experience is "the way it is," when in fact there are plenty of programs in other areas of the country that are quite different.
e.g. "There's no such thing as a compliant 80 hour rule."---Follow that up with "if there is, then the residents are weak/teaching suffers."
e.g. "All ER docs suck, IM docs suck, etc"
e.g. "No intern is doing (insert procedure here). They just think they are."
You guys often assume that anything other than what you're used to is either inaccurate or inferior, when in fact you couldn't be more wrong. Of course, I don't completely blame you for that, as you're a product of your environment, and are basically regurgitating what you've been told since the first day of med school.
Now I have a question for both you and WS: You have stated that the "coolest cases" the interns have just described were really glorified first assistant roles, and yet you also admit you lacked autonomy as residents. When you participated in these cases as juniors residents, did you count them as surgeon junior or first assist?
If I was doing 50% of the case, I coded them as surgeon junior. If I was essentially holding hook, closing the skin, running the sucker, doing a little Bovieing here and there, I counted it as First Assist. I actually coded nearly all my pediatric surgery cases as a Chief as First Assist because frankly that's what I was doing since the attendings were often double scrubbed for the big cases; the PD made me change it to Surgeon Chief.
It may very well be that interns are doing lap choles and tumor debulking. But I think it worth asking what people mean when they say they are "doing the case" because I have found it to be commonly misperceived. I find that hard to believe that they are "really" doing the case, but I have no interest in arguing because I am willing to admit that I might be wrong. But I am wrong in the NE and wrong here, because I don't see it done here either.
Rather than assume we are wrong because of our NE blinders (and that our experience is only right in the NE and everyplace else in the country is wonderful with interns doing Whipples and never going over 80 hrs), perhaps it might be just as valid an argument to say that what YOU are experiencing is NOT the norm. Who's to say?
Wow, it all the sudden got real tense. Anyway, I guess the highlight of my year was doing a radical nephrectomy with a private urology attending. I did the whole thing... retroperitoneal dissection, exposing the hilum and ureter, taking them, and closing up. It was awesome. Of course, this would have never happened with the university faculty, but I was just in the right place at the right time.
You and I got in an argument a while back about a similar topic. I guess what frustrates me is that people in the Northeast have a certain amount of tunnel vision, and tend to assume that their experience is "the way it is," when in fact there are plenty of programs in other areas of the country that are quite different.
You guys often assume that anything other than what you're used to is either inaccurate or inferior, when in fact you couldn't be more wrong. Of course, I don't completely blame you for that, as you're a product of your environment, and are basically regurgitating what you've been told since the first day of med school.
Now I have a question for both you and WS: You have stated that the "coolest cases" the interns have just described were really glorified first assistant roles, and yet you also admit you lacked autonomy as residents. When you participated in these cases as juniors residents, did you count them as surgeon junior or first assist?
Wow, it all the sudden got real tense.
However, I get nervous that med students will come to this forum and suffer from its severe sample bias, and then this will compromise their ability to see their true options when it comes to residency. When I start to rant, it's usually with the somewhat disguised intention of letting the students know that they have a few more choices than they thought.